The Forum for Partners in Iran's Marketplace
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     

Monetary and Capital Market Exclusive, March 2004


 

Monetary and Capital Market in Iran

Bank Refah Reaping the Rewards of Excellence

Mohammad Taghi Jamalian, Managing Director of Bank Refah

Bank Refah is one of the commercial banks of Iran, which has greatly enhanced its activities during recent years by relying on four decades of experience in providing banking services. At present, 96% of the bank’s capital, which amounts to 896 billion rials, is owned by the Social Security Organization.

Recruitment of educated manpower in all bank units has been the main priority of Refah Bank during the recent years, so that, the share of personnel holding university degrees has raised from 16% in 1998 to about 60% in 2002. This development combined with reduction in average service age of personnel, has provided the bank with a good opportunity to use new banking technologies for promoting quality of services. Bank Refah, as the first successful commercial bank of Iran, managed to obtain ISO 9001 version 2000 certificate for all its branch operations in 2000 from the DQS Company of Germany.

The bank has managed to find its deserved place among the Iranian commercial banks by having 1,130 branches and taking advantage of 9,500 efficient personnel, so that, average growth of deposits and related facilities stood at about 50% during 1998-2002, which was respectively 70% and 46% above average growth compared to other commercial banks in the country. Average annual growth of net profits of Bank Refah during the said years also topped 300%, which was about threefold the average growth of that index among other commercial banks.

Bank Refah has been effectively participating in developing the capital market in the country during the recent years through increasing volume of operations of its agency at Tehran Stock Exchange, on the one hand, and making possible stock dealings in provincial centers, on the other.

Methods Used for Developing Monetary and Capital Markets: Monetary market is concerned with creating and dealing money and providing short-term finance, which is manifested in the country’s banking system. The capital market, on the other hand, is concerned with long-term finance which is manifested in the stock exchange. The common goal of both markets is procuring financial resources needed by investors. Today, capital and monetary markets have been so intermingled that nobody can make a clear demarcation between them. Some financial instruments are of a short-term nature but are dealt in the capital market. On the contrary, banks are responsible for some financial instruments that are long-term (such as housing loans). Therefore, the monetary and capital markets supplement each other and many of their capacities take shape and are completed as a result of interactions between the two markets.

Some of those interactions between monetary and capital markets could be discussed in three following domains:

1. Facilitating Interactions: The agency of banks currently accounts for a considerable amount of stock dealing and capital market trading and is considered a major stock supplier in the stock market. Therefore, banks can play a great role in facilitating operations and improving turnover of transactions in the capital market as well as attracting capital. Banks can also establish public access to the capital market through their widespread network and by adopting appropriate policies and establishing direct interaction between applicants and the stock market.

Providing needed infrastructures for the establishment of electronic banking and, in its broad sense, the e-commerce network in the country would greatly facilitate the process of transactions and money transfer. Also, establishment of electronic banking will pave the way for linking domestic monetary and capital markets to international financial institutions and would make possible mutual investment in domestic and foreign capital markets while paving the way for international activities by the country’s foreign exchange market.

Naturally, the presence of an advanced banking system would make the practical the use of new financial instruments for barter and settlement of securities transactions as well as issuing needed guarantees in the capital market.

2. Developing Interactions: The concept of usury-free banking requires that most financial resources of banks should be used in partnership contracts and, therefore, usury-free banking operations act similar to the capital market for recruitment and mobilization of resources. The natural result is that both deposits and most granted facilities would be tradable as capital. As a consequence, a large part of financial assets of banks that stem from their deposits could be traded on the stock exchange. Therefore, in view of the high volume of deposits in domestic banks as compared to the total value of stocks at the capital market, the securities that are tradable at the stock exchange could be issued and transacted at a floating rate by establishing needed mechanisms.

Diversity of deposited instruments in terms of maturity, guarantee and commitment (government, bank or insurance), public and private plans and the like, would lead to the expansion and development of the capital market, on the one hand, and would make it possible for banks to rely more on programmable deposited resources, on the other.

Securities supported by assets are other instruments that have been in use by capital markets for more than three decades. On this basis and given the nature of contracts signed for granting facilities in a usury-free banking system (partnership or ownership) one can define a wide range of various kinds of financial assets supported by various bank-granted facilities including civil participation bonds, legal participation bonds, direct investments, installment sales instruments, hire-purchase instruments and so on. In this way, we can both create new instruments for financing banks to enable them to grant new facilities (without breaching monetary regulations or changing monetary variables including expansion of money basis) and manage banking risks in a better way.

On the other hand, they can lead to valuable developments in terms of diversifying financial instruments at the capital market (other bank assets including guarantees, underwriting, etc. can be defined in this context). Large-scale governmental policies for privatizing banks and offering their stocks on the stock exchange could be another step toward prosperity of the capital market whose realization can lead to increased competition among banks.

3. Supportive Interactions: Banks can play a substantial role in prosperity of the capital market by short-term financing of companies active in the capital market through granting facilities to various economic sectors. Moreover, banks should be able to take action for purchasing stocks and credit stock transactions through grating facilities, so that stocks of companies that have been more active in the bourse could be tradable within the framework of credit purchase. Implementation of this system would increase demand for stocks in the market.

Since banks enjoy the needed specialties for assessing various economic projects and familiarity with capital market mechanisms, to promote specialized management of investments in the stock exchange, they can increase productivity of the capital market and reduce investment risk through specialistic companies by presenting consultancy services.

The reciprocal effect of capital market and banking system would pave the way for comparing output and risk levels in the capital and monetary markets. In other words, such indexes as interbank profit rate, profit rate of bank deposits and interest rate on facilities are good indexes for evaluating performance of the capital market. On the other hand, indexes of the capital market can be used for evaluating efficiency of the monetary market.

On the whole, it seems that development of financial markets including monetary and capital markets requires use of new financial instruments in each of the abovementioned markets as well as establishing needed mechanisms to facilitate transactions between the two markets. To realize this goal, it would be necessary for experts on monetary and capital markets to identify capabilities and capacities for developing interactions of the said markets through attention to policies and goals of each sector, learning from experiences of other countries and endeavoring to institutionalize them.

Attention to the role of other financial institutions including insurance companies, investment companies, finance and credit institutes and similar institutions could pave the way for a balanced and all-out development of domestic financial institutions within the framework of the economic objectives of the country.

 

Subscribe to
IRAN INTERNATIONAL

CURRENT ISSUE
   
  March 2004