|
Securing
the New Securities Bill
The financial markets in Iran have not been at par with the rest of the world.
In 1963, the Stock Exchange Law was passed concentrating on the secondary
market.
|
 |
|
Dr. H. Pourian, Economic and International Affairs Deputy at the TME |
Dr.
Heydar Pourian is the Cabinet-approved representative of the Minister of
Economic Affairs and Finance to the Stock Exchange Council (SEC). He has held
consulting positions in the government and worked in the private sector and is
currently the Economic and International Affairs Deputy at the Tehran Metals
Exchange and the Editor-in-Chief of “Iran Economics” Monthly. In addition
during the last two years, he has served as the Manager of the “Securities
Market Bill” which has been recently passed by the Cabinet, to be presented to
the Majlis. Dr. Pourian holds a PhD in economics from University of Wisconsin
and MA from Fletcher School of Law & Diplomacy and a BA from the National
University of Iran. What follows is an interview we had with him in his
office.
What can you tell us about the new securities bill?
The
financial markets in Iran have not been at par with the rest of the world. In
1963, during the previous regime, the Stock Exchange Law was passed
concentrating on the secondary market. But the primary market, where the
initial investment occurs, was forgotten. The new bill reorganizes and
regulates both of these markets.
Why has the primary market not received enough attention during the previous
regimes or even after the Revolution?
Two
reasons can be cited for this neglect. Oil money provided enough funds for
investment and a “market need” did not arise until recently. Second, experts
from international institutions, such as the World Bank, during a good part of
the past five decades held a narrow view of the capital market, concentrating
on the stock exchange in developing countries which, by the way, was
instrumental in privatization. But gradually the developing world realized it
can organize its primary market to develop faster in terms of production and
employment. During the last decade various countries passed new securities
market legislation (China in 1998).
What deficiencies has the absence of this law caused in Iran?
On a
practical level, the ratio of new investment to production (I/GDP) has dropped
drastically in the post-revolution era, as the market never established its
integrity in Iran.
More
specifically, the no-law approach caused “adverse selection” by the investors,
meaning the risk-return duality in an uninformed, unregulated investment could
not be known. No credibility could be established in such a market. Second,
“moral hazard” meaning discipline in the allocation of funds was not
necessarily pursued according to securities contracts. So various market
attempts—e.g., modarebeh ventures and some investment companies—failed.
Third,
“expost verification” did not exist. Professional reporting of financial and
other information was absent. In other words, comparable to “Truth in Lending”
was not present in the capital market. The undeveloped capital market
persisted, since the integrity and credibility of the system could not be
established. These resulted in capital flight, low productivity and
unsustainable development.
How did the legislative process work in Iran?
When Mr.
Khatami was elected president, a group of experts were organized under the
joint effort of the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance, the Stock
Exchange’s Board of Directors, the Banking System, as well as several
investment companies. A year and a half long study resulted in five research
documents. Then a group of financial and legal experts turned these studies
into a first draft of the bill. But due to the inertia present in our
government, the bureaucracy forgot all about the bill as other domestic
political and social issues were given priority. When Mr. Mazaheri was
appointed as the Minister of Economic Affairs and Finance, I presented him
with the draft for which I had severed as the manager. He immediately sent the
draft to the Cabinet and with the approval of Dr. Aref; work began inside and
outside the government. We worked and collected a large number of views and
comments, which led to small revisions in the bill. Finally, it was passed
after a year’s work in the specialized Economic Commission of the cabinet
(with its eight deputy ministers as well as the Central Bank and the
Management and Plan Organization). We had an uphill battle in many fronts. But
it was eventually passed by the Economic Commission of the Cabinet and finally
by the Cabinet chaired by President Khatami himself.
What’s inside the new bill?
|
On a practical level, the ratio of new investment to production (I/GDP) has
dropped drastically in the post-revolution era, as the market never
established its integrity in Iran. |
The new
bill is divided into the following sections:
-
Definitions, including such concepts as Self Regulatory Organization (SROs),
market makers and inside information.
-
The
oversight structure, including the establishment of new Stock Exchange &
Securities Commission. This commission is composed of several ministers, the
Governor of the Central Bank and representative of the Chamber of Commerce and
professional groups, Chaired by the Minister of Economic Affairs and Finance.
This commission is not unlike the current SEC in
Iran, but
its task is policymaking. In addition, a full time Executive Commission is
formed which carries out the oversight of both primary and secondary markets.
It has five non-political members.
-
Primary
market regulation and procedures for securities registration.
-
Secondary
market rules for SROs, which include stock exchanges and to-be-organized
Brokers’ Associations.
-
Information dissemination.
-
Unlawful
price setting, inside trading and the penalties.
Where is the bill now?
It is
being reviewed by a Commission of the Judiciary, chaired by Mr. Shahroodi.
What are your hopes?
My hopes
are that the new bill, once passed by the Majlis next year, will organize an
efficient, fair, transparent securities market assisting Iran in its long-term
path to production, employment and non-inflationary, sustainable development. |