The
Millennium Summit 2000 |
We the Peoples |
Six billion
human beings. Rapid globalization. Intractable conflicts. Genocide and ethnic cleansing.
Promoting development. Combating narcotics and AIDS. Poverty alleviation. Controlling
climate change. As humanity reflects on the challenges we face at this millennial
milestone, it is a chance also to reflect on the only global organization to which we can
turn: the United Nations.
On 15 March 2000, the General Assembly adopted
resolution 54/254 by which it decided that a summit will be held from 6 to 8 September
2000 under the overall topic of The Role of the United Nations in the 21st
Century. It also decided that the Summit will be composed of plenary meetings and of
four interactive round-table sessions. The following is a report on the Millennium Summit
September 6-8, at the United Nations Headquarters:
To consider how to
strengthen the role of the world body in meeting the challenges of the twenty-first
century, the UN General Assembly decided to designate its 55th session, started on
September 5, 2000, as the Millennium Assembly of the United Nations and to hold a
Millennium Summit.
Likely to be the largest-ever gathering of
heads of state or government, the Summit was a historic occasion for the 188 Member States
of the United Nations to address the challenges of the new century. It was held from
September 6-8 at the UN Headquarters in New York. At the Summit, heads of State or
government delivered formal statements and had the opportunity to engage in interactive
discussions by participating in several roundtable meetings.
The turn of the century is a unique and symbolically compelling moment to articulate
and affirm an animating vision for the United Nations in the new era, the General
Assembly stated when it decided in December 1998 to hold the Millennium events, based on
the Secretary-Generals recommendation.
The Subject of dialogue transcends diplomatic norms |
 |
| A Handshake to last
long: President Khatami and Russias Vladimir Putin are expected to meet again |
 |
| President Khatami
and Jordans King Abdullah: First brief meeting |
 |
| Iranian and
Nigerian Presidents: Representing hopes and concerns of the developing world in the new
millennium |
Outcomes of the Millennium Summit: The unprecedented and large
gathering of the heads of state in the United Nations Headquarters ended in New York in
which over 150 countries participated. The achievements of the Summit can be reviewed at
least from three aspects:
1. Perhaps the most important achievement
of the Summit is the strengthening of the position of the host, i.e. the United Nations.
The organization is the center of collective efforts of humans for confronting the threats
against the humanitys future. The failure of the UN in peacekeeping operations in
such regions as Bosnia and Herzegovina and Rwanda has tarnished the image of the
international organization. The loyalty of the participants in the final declaration of
the Summit to peacekeeping operations and building a new structure for that, gives
everyone the hope that with the start of the new millennium, the United Nations would be
able to act more powerfully for the realization of its goals.
2. The second achievement is the unanimity
that the heads of state reached during the Summit over the combat against disasters that
have endangered the fate of humanity, such as poverty, war, HIV and environment
deterioration. If the ambitious objectives mentioned in the final declaration of the
Summit the commitment to provide elementary education for all children, reducing
maternal and childhood mortality rates, access to drinking waterare materialized, it
would create a revolution in the human life. But the materialization would not be possible
without the will of the world leaders and using modern technologies. Expressing this
commitment by the heads of state would be a good start for a new millennium.
3. The last important achievement of the
Summit is the meetings held between the heads of state. During the meetings they had a
good opportunity to hear the other sides ideas and tell them their own. The visits
between the leaders were very promising for the end of clashes and misunderstandings, and
were a milestone for the start of dialogue among civilizations proposed by the
Iranian President Mohammad Khatami.
This is while analysts and observers
believe that the world countries should reach a Charter like that of the Human
Rights for the interactions and dialogue between nations. Such a framework would be
able to make up for the shortages in the UN Charter. It should also be able to prepare a
ground for mutual respect for all existing civilizations of the world and prevent the
imposing of one culture over another.
Today, other countries in the region or even the Western nations look at Iran as a
successful model of diplomacy, analysts say. The recent visit of President Khatami
and his speech at the United Nations have brought about a new position for the Islamic
Republic of Iran.
Khatami has offered a picture from Iran with respect to the dialogue among civilizations
that has been a success for the country. A president cannot achieve such a success easily.
The unique point the President speech was setting forth is the notion of an Islamic
democracy which was quite new for many of the worlds leaders who believe that
a democratic system, which is based on Islamic principles, cannot be materialized at all,
but Khatami showed it could.
Now it is advisable for the Iranian government not to overlook such a desirable position
achieved for the Islamic Republic at the international scene, experts suggest, as many
nations who did not have good relations with Iran in the past try to get closer to this
country today.
The plan of Dialogue among Civilizations plainly showed to the community of nations that
Iran is responsive to the needs of the international arena. Furthermore, Irans
rotating chairmanship of the Organization of Islamic Conference and its role in settling
regional disputes provides original theoretical foundations in global equations.
The plan of dialogue cannot be pigeon-holed into mere ordinary diplomatic issues. The
subject of dialogue transcends diplomatic norms. The concept has philosophical roots and
can define a new paradigm for human relations in the social arena in the new millennium. |