|
The Question Facing OPEC
 |
"OPEC
can no longer ignore these reforms, and its obstructionist activities will
only prolong its inevitable downfall as its income will plummet to zero by
2100" |
At the
invitation of the Institute for International Energy Studies, Professor Mohsen
Masserrat, delivered a lecture on “the impact of the European Union’s policy
on climate change on
Iran and other OPEC countries”. Masserrat, who has been living in
Germany since 1964, completed his post-doctoral thesis on economics
in 1978 and was dean of the Department of Social Sciences at the
University of
Osnabrück in 2002. At the outset of his address, he apologized for his
possible stuttering and inarticulation, and nonetheless continued to deliver a
vibrant, engaging and flawless presentation. Besides, a few stammers would be
forgiven a man who has more than 270 titles (in Persian, German, French,
Spanish, Japanese and Dutch) to his credit.
Early on in his speech, Masserrat alarmed
the audience with a bombardment of worrisome statistics from the World Energy
Council, International Atomic Energy Agency, Stockholm Environmental
Institute, Wuppertal Institute for Climate and Environment Energy, all of
which prophesized an imminent environmental disaster. Rising sea levels and
50% of the world living in coastal areas is not a good combination, not to
mention the unprecedented turbulent weather which recently wrecked havoc in
Europe.
|
"Global
environment is a global problem that can only be solved with unanimous
global effort and if OPEC does not want to be left behind, it must tag
along the reform wagon"z |
There was a collective sigh of relief when
he said strict global adherence to the Kyoto Protocol and reduction in fossil
fuel consumption would postpone the environmental crisis. Today’s emissions
must be reduced to a third, despite the projected tripling of energy
consumption by 2050. This gap must be filled by environmentally-friendly
renewable energies. To this end
Europe, and to a lesser extent the
United States, have conducted extensive research into alternate sources of
energy and have implemented policies encouraging their use. In
Germany, regulations compel companies to use the more expensive wind
or solar energies where available. It is projected that by 2100 fossil fuels
will be completely substituted by renewable energies. Nuclear energy, however,
is not considered an option because even with a 300% increase in capabilities,
it can only account for 7% of the need. The apolitical lecture strategically
skirted around
Iran’s controversial Bushehr power plant.
What it lacked in politics, it made up for
in economics, as financing these strategies was next attended to. A
comprehensive overview of factors affecting oil prices, complete with charts
and diagrams, was presented. It was established that the scarcity price (read
real price) of oil is at least $40 and probably as high as $70 per barrel.
There are numerous forces working to keep oil prices down and Masserrat claims
it is the consumers, rather than the producers, who determine prices. An
example of such forces is the European state tax imposed on oil imports which
occasionally exceeds OPEC’s oil income. It is no wonder that
Europe will expand its taxing policy to include an ECO tax – with
the increased in revenue to finance research into renewable energies.
Iran and OPEC can no longer ignore these reforms and their
obstructionist activities will only prolong their inevitable downfall as
OPEC’s income will plummet to zero by 2100 as projected by the Stockholm
Energy Institute's sustainable energy scenario.
Masserrat concluded his remarks by calling
attention to the fact that the global environment is a global problem that can
only be solved with unanimous global effort and if
Iran and OPEC do not want to be left behind, they must tag along
the reform wagon.
When the floor was opened to questions, a
senior official of the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) grilled Masserrat
on global warming, asking with our fossil fuels being exhaustible by nature
and scientific data being arguable projections of the future, is it wise to
abandon a system that works for us?
To this Masserrat coolly answered we cannot
sit around and do nothing because we cannot tell the future. It is true that
the scientific data are merely arguable projections, but they are arguable
both ways, and the disasters forecasted can occur in 20 rather than 200 years.
What is certain is that providing for worst case scenarios is better than
getting caught unaware, and that is even more certain than the exhaustibility
of our fossil fuels. At the outset it was predicted that fossil fuels would
last only 50 years, which was true for the time, but with the constant
advancement in technology and exploration techniques and the rise in oil
prices, more oil is being recovered from more reserves which have now become
financially viable to exploit.
We must increase our cooperation with
Europe, the pioneer in renewable energy and facilitate investment
and technology transfer between OPEC and
Europe. Such a move would be welcomed by
Europe as environmental issues are zealously pursued on government
agendas. European governments currently spend billions of dollars enforcing
their imposed oil consumption limits. This expenditure will be avoided if OPEC
countries become active in the
Kyoto reforms and agree to reduce their productions on condition
that governments eliminate their interfering policies and let the market
itself determine the price of oil (which will be the same as the scarcity
price). This will be mutually beneficial, as OPEC will sell less oil with at
least the same profit and
Europe will have more money to spend on renewable energies in a
cleaner environment.
OPEC’s current policy is aligned with that
of the
United States who won’t bother with reforms at a time when oil is so
cheap. This mindless alliance between consumers and producers to protect this
system was put on display in
Johannesburg summit where they prevented the enactment of any obligating
environmental treaty – to the outrage of the world community. But with
environmental disaster ever-more imminent, it seems certain that this system
must be abandoned sooner or later. The question is whether there will be any
environment left when it is. |