The Forum for Partners in Iran's Marketplace
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     

May 2003 / No. 23


Banking

Challenges of the
E-Banking Revolution

E-banking is an opportunity for countries with underdeveloped financial systems to leapfrog developmental stages

E-banking (electronic banking) is the wave of the future. It provides enormous benefits to consumers –in terms of the ease and cost of transactions– and banks –in terms of new business opportunities. However, it also poses new challenges for country authorities in regulating and supervising the financial system and in designing and implementing macroeconomic policies.

E-banking has been around for some time in the form of automatic teller machines (ATMs) and telephone transactions. More recently, it has been transformed by the Internet. This newest channel for banking services is the focus of this report.

With e-banking access is fast, convenient, and available around the clock, whatever the customer’s location. Plus, services are provided more efficiently and at substantially lower costs. Comparing bank services and products is made easier and therefore competition is increased, allowing banks to penetrate new markets. It is even an opportunity for countries with underdeveloped financial systems to leapfrog developmental stages.

The flip side to this technological boom in e-banking is the exacerbation of some of the risks inherent in traditional banking, particularly governance, legal, operational, and reputational.

Trends in E-banking: E-banking is rapidly gaining ground; with more and more banks operating websites through which customers are able not only to inquire about account balances and interest and exchange rates but also to conduct a range of transactions. To date, most banks have combined the new electronic delivery channels with traditional "brick banks" creating "brick and click banks". However, a small number of banks offer their products and services predominantly, or only, through electronic distribution channels. These "virtual" or "internet-only" banks do not have a branch network but might have a physical presence, for example, an administrative office or non-branch facilities like kiosks or ATMs.

Most banks have combined the new electronic delivery channels with traditional "brick banks" creating "brick and click banks".

New Challenges for Regulators: This changing financial landscape brings with it new challenges for bank management and regulatory and supervisory authorities. These stem from increased cross border transactions due to drastically lower costs, greater ease of banking activities, and reliance on technology to provide necessary security measures.

Regulatory risk: Because the Internet allows services to be provided from anywhere in the world, there is a danger that banks will try to avoid regulation and supervision. Regulators must require even banks that provide their services from a remote location through the Internet to be licensed. Licensing would be particularly appropriate where supervision is weak and cooperation between a virtual bank and the home supervisor is not adequate. However, determining when a bank’s electronic services trigger the need for a license can be difficult, but indicators showing where banking services originate and where they are provided can help.

Legal risk: E-banking carries heightened legal risks for banks. Banks can potentially expand the geographical scope of their services faster through e-banking than through traditional banks. In some cases, they may not be fully versed in a jurisdiction’s local laws and regulations before they begin to offer services there, either with or (where one is not required) without a license. When a license is not required, a virtual bank –lacking contact with the host country supervisor– may find it even more difficult to stay abreast of regulatory changes. As a consequence, virtual banks could unknowingly violate laws and regulations and expose themselves to losses through lawsuits or crimes that are not prosecuted because of jurisdictional disputes. Moreover, e-banking greatly facilitates the age-old crime of money laundering because of the anonymity it affords. Once a customer opens an account, it is impossible for banks to identify whether the nominal account holder is conducting a transaction or even where the transaction is taking place. To combat money laundering, many countries have issued specific guidelines on identifying customers.

Operational risk: The reliance on new technology to provide services makes security and system availability the central operational risks of e-banking. Security threats can come from inside or outside the system, so banking regulators and supervisors must ensure that banks have appropriate practices in place to guarantee the confidentiality of data and as well as the integrity of the system. Bank’s security practices should be regularly tested and reviewed by outside experts to analyze network vulnerabilities and recovery preparedness.

Reputation risk: Breaches in security and disruptions in the system’s availability can damage a bank’s reputation. The more a bank relies on electronic delivery channels, the greater the reputation risk. If one e-bank encounters problems that cause customers to lose confidence in electronic delivery channels as a whole or to view bank failures as system-wide supervisory deficiencies, these problems can potentially affect other providers of e-banking services. Reputation risks also stem from customer misuses of security precautions or ignorance about the need for such precautions. Security risks can be amplified and may result in a loss of confidence in electronic delivery channels. The solution is consumer education –a process in which regulators and supervisors can contribute.

There are three key tools that regulators need to focus on to address the new challenges posed by the arrival of e-banking: adaptation, legalization and harmonization.

Regulatory Tools: There are three key tools that regulators need to focus on to address the new challenges posed by the arrival of e-banking:

Adaptation: In light of how rapidly technology is changing and what the changes mean for banking activities, keeping regulations up to date has been, and continues to be, a far-reaching, time-consuming, and complex task. The bank’s board of directors and senior management must review and approve the key aspects of the security control process, which should include measures to authenticate the identity and authorization of customers, promote non-repudiation of transactions, protect data integrity, and ensure segregation of duties within e-banking systems, databases, and applications. Regulators and supervisors must also ensure that their staffs have the relevant technological expertise to assess potential changes in risks, which may require significant investment in training and hardware and software.

Legalization: New methods for conducting transactions, new instruments, and new service providers will require legal definition, recognition, and permission. For example, it will be essential to define an electronic signature and give it the same legal status as the handwritten signature.

Harmonization: International harmonization of e-banking regulation must be a top priority. This means intensifying cross-border cooperation between supervisors and coordinating laws and regulatory practices internationally and domestically across different regulatory agencies. Jurisdiction problems that arise from "borderless" transactions are still in limbo. The task of international harmonization and cooperation can be viewed as the most daunting in addressing the challenges of e-banking.

The Macroeconomic Challenges: As the advent of e-banking quickly changes the financial landscape and increases the potential for quick cross-border capital movements, macroeconomic policymakers face several difficult questions:

If e-banking makes national boundaries irrelevant by facilitating capital movement, what does this imply for macroeconomic management?

How is monetary policy affected when, for example, the use of electronic means makes it easier for banks to avoid reserve requirements, or when business can be conducted in foreign currencies as easily as in domestic currency?

When offshore banking and capital flight are potentially only a few mouse clicks away, does a government have any leeway for independent monetary or fiscal policy?

How will the choice of the exchange rate regime be affected, and how will e-banking influence the targeted level of international reserves of a central bank?

Can a government afford to make any mistakes? Will the spread of e-banking impose harsh market discipline on governments and businesses?

The answers to these questions fall into two emerging strands of thought. First, the technological revolution could result in a reassessment of households’ and firms’ decision of conducting their financial operations purely through the central bank. Thus, the ability of monetary policy to influence inflation and economic activity will be threatened. Second, as e-banking expands financial transaction costs will decline significantly, in effect reducing the "sand in the wheels" of the financial sector machinery, making capital flow even easier, with a potential erosion of the effectiveness of domestic monetary policy.

Conclusion: While e-banking can provide a number of benefits for customers and new business opportunities for banks, it exacerbates traditional banking risks. Even though considerable work has been done in some countries to adapt banking and supervision regulations, continuous vigilance and revision –especially on the international level– will be essential as the scope of e-banking increases. Moreover, the ease with which capital can potentially be moved between banks and across borders creates a greater sensitivity to economic policy management. To understand the impact of e-banking on the conduct of economic policy, policymakers need a solid analytical foundation. Without one, the markets will provide the answer, possibly at a high economic cost.

 

Subscribe to
IRAN INTERNATIONAL

CURRENT ISSUE
   
  May 2003 / No. 23