|
|
| |
|
|
|
September
2003 / No. 25 |
|
|
|
Global
Economy |
|
|
Economic
Internationalization
| New Economic
Conditions of a Globalized World |
At present, basic changes in the global
economy have become a reality and without any doubt, the international economy
and its components have developed extensively under the influence of
communications and information. As a result of these changes, economic
development has become progressively possible in various countries during past
several decades and, in other words, it has been globalized.
Internationalization of the economic
activities is not a new phenomenon and dealings in certain goods have enjoyed
a global nature during many centuries. The trend of the international trade
during the industrialization of Europe in the 18th century has taken on a new
momentum. However, until recently, production process was restricted to
national economies. The final products were only traded at local markets and
global trade meant nothing but exchange of raw materials and foodstuff.
Since 1950s, the nature of the world
economy has changed and national borders no longer seem adequate to contain
production processes, so that, now after about half a century, there are few
industries that are operating at local or even regional levels. Today, the
bulk of new economic activities can only be realized in relation to global
communications and due to increased intricacy of production methods among
various countries, recognizing the true origin of a specified product has
become increasingly difficult. A specified commodity can be the product of
many components produced in many countries and usually, the trademark belongs
to the country where all components have been assembled. Under these
circumstances, what is the meaning of a British car, an American computer, a
German camera or a Dutch television?
 |
Globalization is a qualitative concept not limited to
geographical expansion, but a more general concept including solidarity of
performance in international production. |
During past decades, the process of
international trade has become more complicated. Previous framework of
transactions, which was based on workforce distribution among satellite and
central countries, has turned into an extensive structure, whose continuation
has led to disintegration of many production methods and their reestablishment
in new geographical regions. Large-scale figures presented in industrial
statistics as shown in Table 1 indicate that the global economy is expanding
around three major poles of North America, Europe and Asia, especially the
East Asia. Although these regions accounted for 87% of total word production
and 80% of commodity exports, new industrial centers simultaneously evolved in
newly industrialized economies (NIEs) and formed a global puzzle alongside
other ancient centers of the world and within framework of new arrangements.
Consolidation of international economy
was nothing but a shallow integration before 1913, which was carried out as
simple trade of goods and services among independent corporations and through
transfer of capital on a global scale. However, deep economic integration,
which has been organized by transnational corporations, is currently the focus
of attention and the above concept has been generalized to various levels of
goods and service production. Until recently, the process of
internationalization was only a simple generalization of economic activities
within national borders and this quantitative concept only referred to a big
regional production models. But globalization is a qualitative concept not
limited to geographical expansion, but encompassing a more general concept
including solidarity of performance in the international production cascade.
Table 1: Top
Industrial Countries of the World
|
Rank |
Country |
Added
value of industrial sector |
Share
of total global production |
|
1 |
Unites States |
1611763 |
26.9 |
|
2 |
Japan |
1257761 |
21 |
|
3 |
Germany |
692191 |
11.6 |
|
4 |
France |
265611 |
4.5 |
|
5 |
UK |
243653 |
4.1 |
|
6 |
South Korea |
159172 |
2.7 |
|
7 |
Brazil |
154425 |
2.6 |
|
8 |
China |
139031 |
2.3 |
|
9 |
Italy |
128486 |
2.2 |
|
10 |
Canada |
100323 |
1.7 |
|
11 |
Argentine |
88366 |
1.5 |
|
12 |
Spain |
81196 |
1.4 |
|
13 |
Taiwan |
73295 |
1.2 |
|
14 |
Australia |
64417 |
1.1 |
|
15 |
Switzerland |
60111 |
1 |
|
Total
|
|
|
85.8 |
Source: UNIDO
(1996)
Global Production Cascades and
Transnational Corporations:
The production cascade denotes a series
of interrelated operations that lead to more added-value in every stage of
producing a commodity or service. The basic components of a production cascade
include production components, executive connections with regard to
technologies and inputs as well as coordinating laws and regulations. Today,
transnational corporations play a major part in coordinating global production
cascades and the traditional definition of multinational companies, which was
based on ownership level of international assets by such companies, seems to
have lost efficiency. Although transnational corporations still own
considerable assets around the world and frequently interact with other
independent corporations through complicated forms of communications, but
according to modern concepts, transnational corporations are institutions that
enjoy enough power for coordinating and controlling industrial operations in
various countries without necessarily having direct ownership rights.
In other words, without having
production assets in different parts of the world, a transnational corporation
can control the methods through which production assets are being used in
various countries. Therefore, it is possible that in a global production
cascade, production is being carried out by independent corporations, while
international connections in the cascade including externalized transactions
are carried out through a market attended by transnational corporations. On
the other hand, sometimes the whole production cascade can take shape inside a
transnational corporation in the form of vertical integration. In this case,
connections inside the production cascade will consist of internalized
transactions that are carried out according to a hierarchy in that
corporation. In fact, decisions made by corporations about this dichotomy,
that is, market-oriented externalized transactions and hierarchical
internalized transactions as well as decisions about what kind of system must
be organized inside and what kind of operations should be taken outside the
corporation has given rise to two different spectra of global economic
networks:
A. Producer-oriented production
cascades: It refers to
those industries in which transnational or other big industrial corporations
play a central role in controlling production system (including pre- and
post-production activities and contacts for that industry). This is a
characteristic of high-tech industries needing huge capital including
automobile, computer, and electronic equipment industries.
B. Consumer-oriented production
cascades: It refers to
those industries in which retailers along with a network of prominent
international businesspeople and commercial transnational corporations play an
important part in decentralization of production networks in major exporter
countries including such applied industries as textile.
It should be noted that global
production cascades are influenced by laws enacted by national governments and
the impact of governments on the industry has still remained quite powerful.
In other words, all components of a production cycle are currently influenced
by these laws within the framework of industrial policies based on the
viewpoints of the governments. Also, transnational institutions such as the
International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization or such economic
groupings as the European Union, OPEC and NAFTA influence such laws. The
important point is that governments play the role of a locomotive for
compiling economic policies aimed at promoting national welfare and these
policies are, naturally, quite distinct. Therefore, all commercial and
industrial institutions as well as transnational corporations are trying to
take advantage of differences in laws of host countries. Meanwhile, the
governments, on the other hand endeavor to minimize discrepancies and regional
differences.
Today, this interaction has led to a
complex situation of power games between transnational corporations and
governments.
Conclusion:
Due to current situation of the
world, out of five approaches mentioned for the industrial development, the
following four approaches cannot be applied. The first approach, which was the
original model for the industrial development, preceded the Industrial
Revolution and was adopted under specific global conditions. The second
approach, which believed the goal of the industry to be self-sufficiency based
on political and ideological objectives, is a model for countries that have
been isolated from the global system. In these countries, welfare of
individual people is an accessory variable in comparison to achieving
independence in the sense of less commercial dependence on the West. The third
approach or import replacement took shape under an atmosphere of global
economy in which, firstly, there was no developing country in the world
capable of selling industrial products to high-income countries and, secondly,
global economy had shrunk under the weight of two world wars and a universal
stagnation in the industrialized nations. The fourth approach was adopted
under conditions that unlike the past, industrialized nations were moving
rapidly ahead and had provided a good ground for developing nations to incline
toward exports. At that time, the role of domestic industrial economic
policies in realization of the industrial exports was very determining.
Policies on forex parity rate, interest rate, payment of export subsidies,
granting tax exemptions to exporters and so forth, had provided suitable
conditions for developing exports.
However, the latest method or the fifth
approach, which is attainable in an age of globalization is being defined
within framework of global industry and includes the model of dominance of
trademarks, participation in value cascade and the model of deep industrial
and commercial ties in various parts of the world. In this approach, adopting
suitable economic and industrial policies inside the country is only a
necessary condition for the industrial growth and not a sufficient condition.
In fact, the sufficient condition for the industrial development in the world
is becoming part of the global production cascade and the global system of
division of labor. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CURRENT ISSUE |
|
|
 |
|
| |
Sep. 2003 / No. 25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|