The Forum for Partners in Iran's Marketplace
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     

September 2003 / No. 25


Global Economy

Economic Internationalization

New Economic Conditions of a Globalized World

At present, basic changes in the global economy have become a reality and without any doubt, the international economy and its components have developed extensively under the influence of communications and information. As a result of these changes, economic development has become progressively possible in various countries during past several decades and, in other words, it has been globalized.

Internationalization of the economic activities is not a new phenomenon and dealings in certain goods have enjoyed a global nature during many centuries. The trend of the international trade during the industrialization of Europe in the 18th century has taken on a new momentum. However, until recently, production process was restricted to national economies. The final products were only traded at local markets and global trade meant nothing but exchange of raw materials and foodstuff.

Since 1950s, the nature of the world economy has changed and national borders no longer seem adequate to contain production processes, so that, now after about half a century, there are few industries that are operating at local or even regional levels. Today, the bulk of new economic activities can only be realized in relation to global communications and due to increased intricacy of production methods among various countries, recognizing the true origin of a specified product has become increasingly difficult. A specified commodity can be the product of many components produced in many countries and usually, the trademark belongs to the country where all components have been assembled. Under these circumstances, what is the meaning of a British car, an American computer, a German camera or a Dutch television?

Globalization is a qualitative concept not limited to geographical expansion, but a more general concept including solidarity of performance in international production.

During past decades, the process of international trade has become more complicated. Previous framework of transactions, which was based on workforce distribution among satellite and central countries, has turned into an extensive structure, whose continuation has led to disintegration of many production methods and their reestablishment in new geographical regions. Large-scale figures presented in industrial statistics as shown in Table 1 indicate that the global economy is expanding around three major poles of North America, Europe and Asia, especially the East Asia. Although these regions accounted for 87% of total word production and 80% of commodity exports, new industrial centers simultaneously evolved in newly industrialized economies (NIEs) and formed a global puzzle alongside other ancient centers of the world and within framework of new arrangements.

Consolidation of international economy was nothing but a shallow integration before 1913, which was carried out as simple trade of goods and services among independent corporations and through transfer of capital on a global scale. However, deep economic integration, which has been organized by transnational corporations, is currently the focus of attention and the above concept has been generalized to various levels of goods and service production. Until recently, the process of internationalization was only a simple generalization of economic activities within national borders and this quantitative concept only referred to a big regional production models. But globalization is a qualitative concept not limited to geographical expansion, but encompassing a more general concept including solidarity of performance in the international production cascade.


Table 1: Top Industrial Countries of the World

Rank

Country

Added value of industrial sector

Share of total global production

1

Unites States

1611763

26.9

2

Japan

1257761

21

3

Germany

692191

11.6

4

France

265611

4.5

5

UK

243653

4.1

6

South Korea

159172

2.7

7

Brazil

154425

2.6

8

China

139031

2.3

9

Italy

128486

2.2

10

Canada

100323

1.7

11

Argentine

88366

1.5

12

Spain

81196

1.4

13

Taiwan

73295

1.2

14

Australia

64417

1.1

15

Switzerland

60111

1

Total

 

 

85.8

Source: UNIDO (1996)


Global Production Cascades and Transnational Corporations: The production cascade denotes a series of interrelated operations that lead to more added-value in every stage of producing a commodity or service. The basic components of a production cascade include production components, executive connections with regard to technologies and inputs as well as coordinating laws and regulations. Today, transnational corporations play a major part in coordinating global production cascades and the traditional definition of multinational companies, which was based on ownership level of international assets by such companies, seems to have lost efficiency. Although transnational corporations still own considerable assets around the world and frequently interact with other independent corporations through complicated forms of communications, but according to modern concepts, transnational corporations are institutions that enjoy enough power for coordinating and controlling industrial operations in various countries without necessarily having direct ownership rights.

In other words, without having production assets in different parts of the world, a transnational corporation can control the methods through which production assets are being used in various countries. Therefore, it is possible that in a global production cascade, production is being carried out by independent corporations, while international connections in the cascade including externalized transactions are carried out through a market attended by transnational corporations. On the other hand, sometimes the whole production cascade can take shape inside a transnational corporation in the form of vertical integration. In this case, connections inside the production cascade will consist of internalized transactions that are carried out according to a hierarchy in that corporation. In fact, decisions made by corporations about this dichotomy, that is, market-oriented externalized transactions and hierarchical internalized transactions as well as decisions about what kind of system must be organized inside and what kind of operations should be taken outside the corporation has given rise to two different spectra of global economic networks:

A. Producer-oriented production cascades: It refers to those industries in which transnational or other big industrial corporations play a central role in controlling production system (including pre- and post-production activities and contacts for that industry). This is a characteristic of high-tech industries needing huge capital including automobile, computer, and electronic equipment industries.

B. Consumer-oriented production cascades: It refers to those industries in which retailers along with a network of prominent international businesspeople and commercial transnational corporations play an important part in decentralization of production networks in major exporter countries including such applied industries as textile.

It should be noted that global production cascades are influenced by laws enacted by national governments and the impact of governments on the industry has still remained quite powerful. In other words, all components of a production cycle are currently influenced by these laws within the framework of industrial policies based on the viewpoints of the governments. Also, transnational institutions such as the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization or such economic groupings as the European Union, OPEC and NAFTA influence such laws. The important point is that governments play the role of a locomotive for compiling economic policies aimed at promoting national welfare and these policies are, naturally, quite distinct. Therefore, all commercial and industrial institutions as well as transnational corporations are trying to take advantage of differences in laws of host countries. Meanwhile, the governments, on the other hand endeavor to minimize discrepancies and regional differences.

Today, this interaction has led to a complex situation of power games between transnational corporations and governments.

Conclusion: Due to current situation of the world, out of five approaches mentioned for the industrial development, the following four approaches cannot be applied. The first approach, which was the original model for the industrial development, preceded the Industrial Revolution and was adopted under specific global conditions. The second approach, which believed the goal of the industry to be self-sufficiency based on political and ideological objectives, is a model for countries that have been isolated from the global system. In these countries, welfare of individual people is an accessory variable in comparison to achieving independence in the sense of less commercial dependence on the West. The third approach or import replacement took shape under an atmosphere of global economy in which, firstly, there was no developing country in the world capable of selling industrial products to high-income countries and, secondly, global economy had shrunk under the weight of two world wars and a universal stagnation in the industrialized nations. The fourth approach was adopted under conditions that unlike the past, industrialized nations were moving rapidly ahead and had provided a good ground for developing nations to incline toward exports. At that time, the role of domestic industrial economic policies in realization of the industrial exports was very determining. Policies on forex parity rate, interest rate, payment of export subsidies, granting tax exemptions to exporters and so forth, had provided suitable conditions for developing exports.

However, the latest method or the fifth approach, which is attainable in an age of globalization is being defined within framework of global industry and includes the model of dominance of trademarks, participation in value cascade and the model of deep industrial and commercial ties in various parts of the world. In this approach, adopting suitable economic and industrial policies inside the country is only a necessary condition for the industrial growth and not a sufficient condition. In fact, the sufficient condition for the industrial development in the world is becoming part of the global production cascade and the global system of division of labor.

 

Subscribe to
IRAN INTERNATIONAL

CURRENT ISSUE
   
  Sep. 2003 / No. 25