"Economic
Diplomacy" calls for an end to Iran’s introvert economy in favor of
cooperation with the foreign investor. Iran’s economy is characterized as
introverted and closed, with the government still holding monopolies over many
of its sectors. This is why, despite its exceptional potentials, Iran accounts
for less than 0.5% of international trade. When Iran’s rich culture, natural
resources and energetic and educated workforce are considered, the gross
disproportion of this figure is further amplified.
There is no way Iran can get its hands
on the technological know-how it needs to pull itself out of this slump,
without the assistance of foreign parties. If Iran puts the days of an
introverted economy behind it and embraces foreign partners and adopts their
management methods, it can have its rightful place in global market.
For as long as we have not established a
proper political and economic relationship with the international community we
will be kept in the dark in regards to technological advancements we need to
progress. This leaves us with no choice but to turn to an extroverted economic
vision.
At present we do not see a serious push
towards integration in the global economy; despite the fact that extroverted
economy and adopting market principles have been identified as the saviors of
Iran’s economy for many years now, and have even been suggested as the
backbone of the country’s fourth development plan.
These were the topics under discussion
in the first gathering on Iran’s economic diplomacy—Tehran 23-24 August 2003.
This conference was truly studded with officials with the President, Vice
President, Ministers, Deputies and Iranian Ambassadors as well as political
and economic experts all in attendance.
The participants lauded the efforts of
President Mohammad Khatami and the first Vice President Mohammad-Reza Aref for
supporting economic reforms in the country and called for more attention to be
paid to international business in the Fourth Five-Year Economic Development
Plan. The seminar underlined the interaction between politics and economy and
called for benefiting from them in materializing national and economic
development in the country. Economic growth will result in competitiveness,
qualitative and quantitative development and active presence in regional and
international markets, said the statement. The participants called for
formation of union and societies under the supervision of the foreign ministry
to help promote economic activities in foreign countries. They called on the
government to adopt a supporting system to help the active presence in the
global economy. They underlined the significant role of information technology
to help ease access to global economic development and facilitate
international competition and marketing.
Speaking at the conference’s opening
ceremony First Vice President Mohammad-Reza Aref reiterated the priority of
economic diplomacy to its political and security counterparts in the
contemporary world. He said that in modern diplomacy, diplomats with good
knowledge on world economic developments and know-how on commercial
management, law and international trade play a decisive role. "In the modern
international atmosphere, trade diplomacy and economic relations are the two
inseparable elements of modern economic diplomacy," he noted. Aref said that
Iran should coordinate its domestic and foreign policies with regional and
international situation so as to guarantee its national interests by pursuing
economic diplomacy. Turning to the Third Development Plan (March 2000-2005)
which aims at developing a free economy, he said that Iran will face the
challenge of job creation for its young population and that of filling the
current gap between Iran and some of the world’s recently industrialized
forerunners in the coming years.
|
There
is no way Iran can get its hands on the technological know-how it needs
to pull itself out of this slump, without the assistance of foreign
parties. |
The pivotal axes of the fourth
development plan are mainly aimed at promoting labor culture, focusing on
production and job creation, revised thinking and transformation of beliefs
and scientific traditions.
"Reform of organizational structures and institutions involved in foreign
trade as well as making operational the nation’s diplomatic headquarters to
develop international economic ties are also among the objectives of the
plan," he added. The official reiterated the need for domestic and foreign
coordination to materialize the objectives set by the ruling system. "One of
the most important tasks of the cabinet and its administrators is to provide
necessary grounds for facilitating such coordination and attention to the
system’s general orientation". He hoped that on the eve of launching the
fourth development plan which aims at providing more suitable grounds for
development of a free economy and further economic growth, the Foreign
Ministry, and relevant organizations, will come up with more developed
concepts, strategies, standards and executive trends indispensable to
promotion of economic diplomacy.
Iran’s ambassador to Japan, Ali Majedi,
who spoke at the second day of the conference, stated that Iran must set its
priorities and then conduct its affairs accordingly. If the highest item on
the country’s agenda becomes economic development, then the country’s foreign
policy must also fall in line with this objective.
Our foreign policy must now be geared
towards attracting foreign investment and technology. For example, when East
Asian states were struggling with the economic crisis of 1997, Japan extended
them all financial aid packages to help them rebuild their economy. This is
because the economies of these countries are intertwined to such an extent
that financial hardship in East Asia will have consequences for Japan, and
subsequent consequences for the American and European economies.
But this is not true for the go-it-alone
economy of Iran. What happens to the economy of Iran has no bearing for other
countries in the world. This is because oil is our only trade commodity and we
are living as an isolated island, separate from the international community.
In these circumstances, it falls to the
embassies and diplomats abroad to facilitate this contact with the
international community. This means that our embassies must have acute
awareness of the needs and capabilities of the country, and use this
information to establish a link between the private sectors. The role of the
private sectors must be emphasized in our economic diplomacy. On a global
scale, major economic institutions have—by and large—found their way, and it
is the small businesses in the private sector that depend on embassies to
facilitate their presence in overseas markets.
Mohsen Aminzade, Deputy Foreign Minister
for Asia and Oceania, believes that even though our private sector has a
negligible presence in the international arena, it is still a good start that
can lead to the active presence of Iran’s private sector in world trade in the
years to come. If the Foreign Ministry is responsible for promoting national
security and interests—when the status of economic affairs are considered—it
becomes clear that a grave economic responsibility falls to the ministry.
Navigating the international trade
waters has become tricky with the score of sanctions and restrictions imposed
on Iran, which have made dealing with the West increasingly difficult. This is
why we have started to look to the East. The rapid pace of the vast economic
development of Asia has also encouraged Iran to strengthen its ties with the
continent’s economic heavyweights such as Japan, China, South Korea, India and
Turkey.
Deputy Minister of Oil, Mohammadreza
Nematzadeh, claimed that despite the central role that per capita income plays
in economic growth, the people have been unfortunately kept in the dark about
its true amount. At a time when the country has adopted a uniform currency
exchange rate, officials are no longer justified in withholding this
information from the people.
Iran has not been able to achieve a
stable and consistent growth rate over the last 23 years, which have been
peppered with constant fluctuations. An approximate average GDP growth rate of
1.5% has been met with a population growth of 2.7%. On a similar note, Iran
has had negligible presence in international trade; with cooperation with Arab
and African states (combined population of one billion) being a national
priority. In such bleak conditions it is clear that foreign investment and an
open economy are Iran’s only ticket out of this slump. It is time for Iran to
extend its hand out in cooperation with foreign partners, before it is too
late.