 |
|
Hamid Reza Katouziyan, Deputy Chairman of Majlis
Industries and Mines Commission |
The path to industrial independence and
development necessitates a stride toward becoming an automobile manufacturing
country.
That is the belief of Deputy Chairman of
Majlis Industries and Mines Commission, Hamid Reza Katouziyan. Iran has
achieved very good capacities with regard to car manufacture and can produce
high-quality products capable of competing with foreign counterparts.
“However, a certain current is still pressuring us to continue car assembly.”
The MP from Tehran opined that since the
beginning of car manufacture in Iran, it was supposed to be dominated by
foreigners, adding, “The industry was meant to be monopolized by French
companies and this has happened in reality.” At present, France and South
Korea dominate Iran’s automobile manufacture industry and the volume of Iran’s
trade with France in this field is much higher that what it should be which is
not useful for Iran.
Iran has gone a long way in car
manufacture and is very good at car assembly. We need a major breakthrough
with regard to automobile industry to be able to conduct more advanced stages
such as design and manufacture. Fortunately, we know many things about car
design. We are not against presence of foreign companies in Iran, but that
partnership should be well-defined and meaningful to safeguard independence of
our country and its car industry. Therefore, remaining a car assembly center
is very dangerous for our country. We must move toward industrial independence
and this is not compatible with car assembly. At the same time, our country is
capable of car design. Therefore, we must tap those capacities and we must not
play with people who have worked in the field and have become experienced
experts. We must not change them in such a way as to render them useless.
Referring to monopolization of car
market in Iran by one or two countries, he added, “France is actively present
in Iran’s car industry. One day, we assembled Talbot Company’s cars and
produced Paykan. Some 98 percent of our manufacture vehicles were Paykan. But
we are turning into a country where most cars are French. Monopolization means
turning into a country ready to accept monopolies and this is not a good
practice because advanced countries of the world are not ready to accept
monopolization, but unfortunately, our country’s authorities have easily
acceded to it and Iran has become a monopolized country in the field of car
manufacture, which is very dangerous.”
“We have seen France’s behavior with
regard to Iran’s nuclear technology. Therefore, for a country which has
achieved a certain level of capability, it is not acceptable to let our market
be totally dominated by a foreign country which is hostile toward us in other
fields” he opined.
The official stated that car manufacture
in Iran is not going through a correct course and that the Ministry of
Industries and Mines is obliged to take the industry out of its current
situation. “If they pursued competition and welfare in the country, they
should have fostered industrial development and prevented monopolization of
domestic markets. If the government and Ministry of Industries and mines
remain indifferent to this issue, we, as Majlis deputies, cannot remain
indifferent and we will use our legal capacities as people’s representatives
and deputies who are duty-bound to protect people’s rights as well as Iran’s
interests. Time is passing rapidly and we are not left with much opportunity.
All we have heard thus far has not gone beyond sloganeering. Words are
beautiful and attractive, but in practice, we don’t see a serious step with
regard to car manufacture,” he said.
Asked about President Ahmadinejad’s
remarks about manufacturing a 100-percent Iranian car in 18 months, Katouziyan
said, “My question is what measures have been taken by our Minister of
Industries and Mines in this regard? If we planned to bring in a car or its
design from China and give it to our people as a national car, it would not be
what the president says, but would be a measure just to show that they have
done something. This will be against the president’s intention and he should
see into this behavior. As far as I have heard thus far, they are not going to
design a new car and there is no determination to do this. They want to
assemble a new car. It seems that a reason for inattention of carmakers to
such remarks is that they don’t believe in what the president says. Therefore,
if they do not believe in it, they should communicate their view to the
president and the Minister of Industries. If they do believe in it, they
should take practical steps because no such step has been taken thus far and
nobody has gone past lip service.”