 |
|
Asia
Building on Success |
|
The integration of
capital markets has helped to allocate savings and investment more
efficiently, but it has also increased the risks from volatile capital
flows and financial contagion. |
Asia, the
world's largest continent with nearly three-fifths of its population, has
undergone a remarkable transformation over the past 50 years. After the Second
World War, Asia was a mix of poor and backward countries, possessing few
natural resources and located far from most industrial countries. Since then,
after embarking on an ambitious drive to open their economies to international
trade and investment, many Asian countries experienced a remarkable period of
sustained economic growth that has helped to lift millions out of poverty and
improve living standards. Now, Asia is an important driving force in the
global economy, featuring 4 of the world's 12 largest economies—Japan, China,
India, and Korea—as well as several of the fastest-growing ones. Although Asia
suffered a temporary setback from the financial crisis of the late 1990s, its
quick recovery and dynamism suggest that its role in the global economy will
continue to grow.
 |
|
With Asia's growing
importance in the world economy, it must play a role—together with other
regions—in helping to address the large global current account
imbalances. |
As Asia looks
to the future, the most important challenge it faces is how to adapt to
globalization, with its wide-ranging impact on trade patterns, production
processes, employment opportunities, and financial linkages. Globalization, of
course, is not new to Asia, a region that has benefited greatly from its close
engagement with the world. But the accelerating pace of globalization is
bringing new issues to the fore.
-
The
integration of capital markets has helped to allocate savings and investment
more efficiently, but it has also increased the risks from volatile capital
flows and financial contagion. How to reduce domestic vulnerabilities,
prevent future crises, and create international and regional safety nets for
insurance against large and volatile capital flows remains a key challenge.
-
The
globalization of production—especially with the rapid emergence of
China and
India—has created tremendous opportunities, but major efforts will be needed
to make the region's economies flexible enough to reap the benefits while
minimizing the associated dislocations. Adjustment costs are already evident
in growing income disparities, as some countries, and groups and regions
within countries, are increasingly being left behind.
-
With
Asia's growing importance in the world economy, it must play a role—together
with other regions—in helping to address the large global current account
imbalances. Reforms will be needed to rebalance growth away from exports
toward domestic demand. Such a rebalancing would not only be in Asia's
interest but would also have positive spillovers to the rest of the world.
In this issue we review some of the key factors behind Asia's transformation
and the challenges Asia faces in adapting to the rapid pace of globalization.
Staggered
start:
Asian countries
began their rapid growth phase at different times. Japan, after the Second
World War, was the first country to take off, followed by the group of
so-called Asian tigers—Hong Kong SAR, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan Province of
China—which embarked in the 1960s on an ambitious outward-oriented strategy
for growth. Other countries in the region soon followed, including Indonesia,
Malaysia, and Thailand. More recently, China and India, pursuing their
different paths of liberalization, have experienced rapid growth.
Overall, the
results have been impressive. From 1950 to 1997, Asian countries grew by
nearly 6 percent a year on average, nearly twice as fast as the rest of the
world and more than 1½ times faster than the United States. Asian countries
now account for about one-fourth of the global economy, in terms of both size
and recent economic growth.
Trade was
critical to success. During 1960–2005, Asia's share in global trade increased
from 11 percent to 26 percent. Trade encouraged industrialization based on the
dynamics of comparative advantage, shifting from agriculture to
labor-intensive manufacturing and, more recently, to more capital-intensive,
high-skilled industries. This pattern of industrialization helped foster
growth with equity by creating new jobs and raising real wages. It also
enhanced domestic competition and facilitated the transfer of advanced
technologies.
Asian
policymakers also pursued sound macroeconomic policies that allowed economic
activity to flourish. These policies contributed to low and stable inflation,
low levels of public debt, and high savings and investment, especially in
human capital and economic infrastructure. Policymakers also demonstrated
flexibility in responding quickly to changes in the external environment, such
as the oil shocks of the 1970s and 1980s, and in abandoning failed industrial
policies in favor of market-led growth.
From miracle
to crisis to recovery:
But in the late
1990s, Asia suffered a painful setback as a financial crisis hit Thailand and
spread quickly through the region. The immediate trigger was the sudden sharp
reversal of capital flows—net capital flows to Asian crisis countries swung
from an inflow of over 6 percent of GDP in 1995 to an outflow of 2 percent of
GDP in 1997 and rose above 5 percent of GDP the following year. But an
underlying cause was structural weakness that left many economies vulnerable
to the sharp withdrawal of capital.
A weak
financial sector saddled with large nonperforming loans; a heavily indebted
corporate sector that overinvested in some sectors, such as real estate; and
doubtful corporate governance practices undermined investor confidence and
exacerbated the crisis. In addition, many Asian countries, such as Korea and
Thailand, relied on a rigidly managed exchange rate regime that was prone to
misalignment and speculative attack.
Policymakers in
the region responded by addressing these structural weaknesses to restore
investor confidence and economic growth. Because Asian countries moved
aggressively to restructure their financial and corporate sectors and
liberalize their economies, investor confidence was quickly restored, allowing
capital to return to the region. This, in turn, helped Asian countries reduce
their external vulnerabilities by replenishing foreign reserves and repaying
foreign debt. In the end, the financial crisis proved to be only a temporary
setback, as many countries quickly realized the benefits of their extensive
reforms and resumed their rapid pace of growth.
|
 |
The time-tested
importance of having a sound macroeconomic framework, including
appropriate monetary and fiscal
policies, to protect against financial
crisis remains relevant for the future. |
What's next?:
As
Asia builds on this recovery, it faces a variety of fresh policy issues
created by the accelerating pace of globalization. They include finding ways
to prevent future crises, strengthening integration to enhance the region's
broader participation in the global economy, seizing the opportunities created
by the rapid emergence of China and India, ensuring that the benefits of
growth are more evenly shared, and contributing to the resolution of global
current account imbalances.
Preventing future crises:The
time-tested importance of having a sound macroeconomic framework, including
appropriate monetary and fiscal policies, to protect against financial crisis
remains relevant for the future. Asian countries have made progress in this
area, particularly by moving to more flexible exchange rate regimes where
appropriate, such as in Korea and Thailand. Many countries have also built up
foreign exchange reserves as a way of cushioning their economies from shocks.
Another key task is to reduce public debt burdens to more comfortable levels.
Since the mid-1990s, the growth in public debt in emerging Asia has been
particularly rapid, rising from about 40 percent of aggregate GDP in 1996 to
about 55 percent in 2005. While there has been progress in reducing debt
ratios, there is wide variation across the region. The current period of
strong growth provides a golden opportunity to curb fiscal imbalances, not
only to reduce vulnerabilities but also to prepare for the fiscal costs of
Asia's aging population, especially in Japan and China.
In addition,
many countries need to further strengthen their financial systems. A healthy
and sound financial system would not only better serve increasingly
sophisticated economies but would also help make markets more resilient by
providing more financial instruments for a broader sharing of risks. To
promote a sound financial sector, there is a need to further strengthen
supervision to safeguard against systemic risk, improve risk-management
skills, enhance corporate governance to strengthen market discipline, and put
in place an efficient bankruptcy system for restructuring.
Strengthening
regional integration:
Since the crisis, Asian countries have taken steps to deepen regional
integration and cooperation. On the trade front, Asia has experienced
remarkable progress, with intraregional trade reaching over 40 percent of
total trade in 2005, a level comparable to that reached in the North American
Free Trade Agreement, up from 30 percent in 1990. Much of this expansion is
being driven by market forces, especially the rapid integration of global
production processes, particularly in China. There is also growing momentum
for regional economic cooperation, including bilateral and regional trade
arrangements (RTAs), most recently with the signing of an agreement between
Korea and Singapore in 2005.
How to make
regionalism work to strengthen trade, investment, and growth for Asian
countries will be a challenge. There is the risk that the proliferation of
RTAs could come at the expense of trade with nonmember countries, known as
trade diversion. To be building blocks rather than stumbling blocks to
multilateralism, RTAs should proceed in parallel with unilateral and
multilateral liberalization. As tariff rates are lowered, the risk of trade
diversion will be minimized.
Furthermore, Asian countries are increasingly being integrated into a regional
supply chain, with final products destined in many cases for exports outside
the region. RTAs can advance this integration, encouraging countries to
specialize and trade more intermediate goods with each other. But this
requires RTAs to be comprehensive in product coverage with few exemptions,
featuring simple and transparent rules of origin to reduce the cost of
compliance.
On the
financial front, Asian governments have also worked to advance regional
cooperation and integration, launching the Chiang Mai and regional bond market
initiatives. Enhancing policy dialogue and expanding regional safety nets are
welcome because they can assist in strengthening regional surveillance,
reducing the risk and severity of liquidity crises, and complementing the role
of the IMF in promoting global financial stability. But, despite progress in
financial reforms, capital markets in many Asian countries are still
relatively underdeveloped. Here, regional initiatives could spur reforms—such
as the harmonizing of laws, regulations, tax treatments, and market
infrastructure—that would help these markets develop.
 |
|
A healthy and sound
financial system would not only better serve increasingly sophisticated
economies but would also help make markets more resilient by providing
more financial instruments for a broader sharing of risks. |
Building on
the opportunities from China and India:
The growth of China and India has contributed to improved prospects for Asia
as a whole. China's emergence as both a production network and a final export
market for the region has been a key factor in boosting intraregional trade
and investment; meanwhile, India has also grown rapidly following reforms in
the early 1990s and, more recently, has become a global leader in service
exports, even though its impact on the regional and global economies has so
far been more limited.
At the same
time, the emergence of these giants has also raised concerns about heightened
competition for foreign investment and exports. Are these worries justified? A
recent IMF staff study contends that China's emergence has so far not crowded
out foreign direct investment (FDI) to other Asian countries, including
low-wage countries. Even so, the impact of China and India's rapid development
on the rest of the region is likely to grow. For other countries in Asia, the
key to seizing the opportunities created by China and India will be to
increase the flexibility of their economies to remain competitive and
responsive.
Here, further
development of capital markets and greater labor market flexibility will
encourage resources to move quickly to new growth industries based on a
country's comparative advantage. Measures to improve the business environment,
such as further deregulation and liberalization of closed sectors, will
facilitate new investment and innovation. Education policies aimed at
upgrading skills will also enable workers to shift into new industries, while
enhancing the social safety net will ease the burden of adjustment for the
most vulnerable.
Sharing the
benefits of growth:
Although globalization has helped improve growth prospects in Asia, the
benefits from this growth have not been evenly shared. Asia remains home to
some of the poorest countries in the world, and even in the fastest-growing
economies, such as China and India, vast areas remain poor and underdeveloped.
In many countries, including the more developed ones, like Japan and Korea,
income inequality is widening, and economies are becoming increasingly
polarized, as some sectors and groups have surged ahead of others.
To ensure that
the benefits from globalization are more evenly shared, Asian countries will
need to pursue reforms that will expand opportunities for the poorest groups
and regions to catch up.
These would include broadening financial systems to improve access to credit
and insurance, particularly by small enterprises and the working poor;
adopting labor reforms that strike the right balance between flexibility and
protection of basic employee security; establishing social safety nets that
encourage labor flexibility; and, in some countries, improving the functioning
of land markets to unlock their productive potential. Policies to improve the
poor's access to quality health care, education, and infrastructure will also
assist in enhancing their economic contribution. Finally, prudent
macroeconomic policies that promote financial stability can help protect the
poorest groups, who, because of a lack of assets and instruments, are more
vulnerable to financial crisis.
Helping
resolve global imbalances:
In recent years, the rise in global current account imbalances has cast a
spotlight on Asia's external surplus, along with the large deficit in the
United States. Although the current account surplus in parts of emerging Asia
and in Japan has started to narrow in response to the rising cost of oil
imports, the strengthening of domestic demand, and exchange rate appreciation
in some countries, more needs to be done.
How to reduce
the imbalances is a hot topic. The large U.S. current account deficit and the
counterpart surpluses in Asia and elsewhere are a concern because of the risks
that a disorderly adjustment could slow global growth, destabilize financial
markets, and lead to the imposition of protectionist policies around the
globe. With its reliance on exports, this would be particularly damaging for
Asia. There is an agreed international cooperative strategy to address the
imbalances, requiring policy actions by deficit and surplus countries to
rebalance demand. For Asia, this involves structural reforms to boost domestic
demand and allow exchange rates to adjust, although there are important
differences in the policy requirements across the region. The needed policy
adjustments in Asia will also help rebalance demand and put growth in the
region on a more sustainable footing.
In emerging
Asia (excluding China),
the surplus largely reflects a collapse in investment rates in the aftermath
of the Asian financial crisis, while saving rates have been relatively stable.
Investment remains subdued despite the progress in corporate and financial
restructuring since the crisis. According to work done by IMF staff, a reason
for the "investment drought" appears to be a perceived increase in risk, which
may reflect more realistic perceptions about risks than during the precrisis
period.
What can be
done to boost investment? On the macroeconomic front, sound policies that
reduce uncertainty will remain critical. On the microeconomic front,
improvements in corporate governance and regulations will reduce the costs of
doing business, while further development of the financial sector will help
transfer risk from the corporate sector to the wider investing public. It will
also help create new financing structures to support startup enterprises,
which will become increasingly important as Asian economies become more
knowledge- and technology-intensive.
In
Japan,
since the early 1990s, the current account surplus has reflected a slower
decline in the national saving rate relative to aggregate investment. Saving
rates have fallen because of demographic factors and countercyclical fiscal
policies to combat deflation, whereas investment has remained weak since the
bursting of the asset-price bubble. Structural reforms to liberalize product
markets, make the labor market more flexible, and encourage inward FDI will
strengthen growth prospects and bolster private investment. They will also
help mitigate the impact of population aging on potential growth.
In
China,
in stark contrast to the rest of Asia, the investment rate has been high and
rising—reaching about 40 percent of GDP in 2005. But, because the saving rate
has risen even faster—to about 47 percent of GDP in 2005—China's current
account surplus has increased considerably. The steady rise in saving rates
reflects increases in government, enterprise, and household savings, which now
account for about 30 percent of disposable income.
If China hopes
to stimulate a more permanent increase in consumption and make economic growth
more balanced over the medium term, it will need to continue reforms on many
fronts. Greater exchange rate flexibility, which, through an appreciation of
the currency, will help boost consumption by raising household purchasing
power, and a shift in budgetary spending toward education, health, and social
safety nets (including reforming the pension system) are important
macroeconomic policy measures. Further banking and financial market reforms
will also prompt increased consumption by creating new savings, consumer
lending, and insurance instruments that will help diversify risk and encourage
households to spend more. In rural China, reforms to enable farmers to sell
their land use rights at market prices and borrow against their land would
also help meet the financing needs of rural households.
Building on
success:
The path that
Asian countries have traveled to growth and prosperity in the past 50 years is
nothing short of remarkable. Many ingredients of that success will remain
relevant for the future—the embrace of openness, the commitment to
macroeconomic stability, and the drive to adapt and reform in response to
changing circumstances.
The rapid pace
of globalization has brought new challenges. To meet them, Asia will need to
continue to reform—to reduce vulnerabilities to crises; deepen regional
integration while remaining open to multilateralism; strengthen financial
systems and enhance the flexibility of its economies in order to benefit from
the emergence of China and India; and rebalance demand to achieve more
sustainable growth. With Asia continuing to reform and adapt, its prospects
will remain bright, and its contributions to the global economy will be even
greater over the next 50 years.
Source: Finance
and Development Magazine |