 |
|
Mohsen Safaei Farahani, Former Deputy of Ministry of
Economic Affairs and Finance |
After amendments were made to Article 44
of the Constitution which were subsequently held up by concerned authorities,
new hopes were raised about a major transformation in Iran’s economic system.
Yet, legal problems are not the only impediments to economic transformation.
The passage of the privatization law, which was not previously implemented
even at low levels, has not brought about a robust private sector activity.
The main reason for recent protests by Majlis deputies and members of the
Expediency Council results from the reality that in a country where 85,000
billion tomans is allocated to the development of state-run companies, there
is no way to implement any form of privatization policy and downsize the
government. Therefore, the executive branch is invariably involved in the
non-realization of privatization policy.
Are correct methods taken into account
in order to attain the goals of privatization in our country? The 20-Year
Perspective Plan has delineated the status of the private sector while the
Fourth Five-Year Economic Development Plan has clearly indicated the ideal
share of the private sector and the amount of investment needed in the sector.
Two years since the onset of the Fourth Economic Development Plan, it remains
to be seen whether or not the necessary assurances have been provided for
investors in the private sector. Naturally, investors will not look at high
risk rates and market instability as major factors. Iran has been repeatedly
ranked as a high-risk investment environment by leading international
standards. Therefore, not only foreign investors are not willing to bring
their money to Iran, but also domestic investors are not interested in
investing in productive economic sectors. In fact, economic activities in the
private sector have not grown suitably and the private sector’s activities
have been carried out on a small scale.
Since the government is the biggest
employer within the economy and runs the biggest contractor establishment with
regard to such key economic sectors as oil, gas, petrochemicals,
telecommunications, post, water, power and steel industry, it prevents
economic activities in the private sector to take root. Thus, owners of
capital have focused their attention on the commercial fields and small to
medium industries. The private banking sector is one example. After seven
years since their establishment, private banks still account for less than 8
percent of banking activities in the country and this imbalance can be
witnessed in other economic sectors.
It seems that even the most preliminary
problems have remained unsolved in Iran. For example, each year hajj pilgrims
are transferred through inefficient state-run system at a very high cost while
a more organized manner can clarify the process and decrease the overall cost.
It seems that powerful currents inside the government are not willing to
loosen their grip on various economic sectors and only chant slogans about the
necessity of privatization, while in practice; they act as a major impediment
to privatization drive.
Last but not least, state investment is
much bigger than private investment and figures related to the transfer of
state-run companies to the private sector do not reflect any major progress in
this regard. Therefore, no promising outlook with regard to privatization is
on the horizon, unless a major change takes place in the government’s attitude
to this issue.