|
|
| |
|
|
|
July
2007, No. 44 |
|
|
|
Industry |
|
|
Small Industries Need More Attention |
 |
|
Small industries enjoy unique features such as high
capacities, innovation, flexibility, being invasive toward market, rapid
reduction in costs, and rapid reaction to economic phenomena. |
Small industries constitute a powerful
means of technological development in many countries and they can, thus, be
considered the parent of big industries. All powerful industries of the world
have started as small industries. Small industries thrive through innovations.
Technological growth is the main factor that helps them develop. Small
industries along with big industries work like different organs of a single
body and the role of neither of them in promoting overall economic development
can be ignored. However, small industries have not achieved their rightful
status in the Iranian economy. Unfortunately, policymakers and state-run
planners of Iran are used to changing their focus on different economic
phenomena. In other words, in one period of time, policymakers are intent on
developing small industries while later on; they pay more attention to other
sectors. The main reason for that instability is ideological; that is, as long
as we pay attention to small industries through an ideological angle, they
will have their main function in the economy. The government cannot focus on
big industries and totally ignore the economic role of small industries. That
sector has its own economic functions and should meet more expectations. To
meet those expectations, government’s approach to small industries should
change.
The most important point that has
imparted an ideological role to small industries in economy is the issue of
employment. No robust economic theory seeks to remedy unemployment through
small industries and in short term. Employment is the result of industrial and
economic developments in a country. If those developments are positive, new
jobs will be created. Otherwise, it is a common mistake to think that
unemployment could be tackled by developing small industries. Small industries
seek to create new opportunities and cannot achieve the target productivity
through accumulation of manpower.
Some claim that new jobs should be
created in labor-intensive industries. They maintain that small
labor-intensive industries can solve unemployment problem because they reach
production stage over a short time. The experience, however, has shown that no
industry can to that because employment policies achieve the said goal in the
long run. You can achieve that goal through extensive planning combined with
development of investment. Even if job creation is to be done through
development of small industries, construction industry is a good field to
attain that goal. Therefore, before doing anything, we must revise the concept
of small industries in the Iranian economy because even use of labor-intensive
industries would be effective in a specified or limited period of time.
Emphasis put on job creation in small industries ultimately harm the sector.
Small industries enjoy unique features
such as high capacities, innovation, flexibility, being invasive toward
market, rapid reduction in costs, and rapid reaction to economic phenomena.
Major industrial states including Germany and the United States are currently
creating special zones to gather small industries there because a lot of
industrial innovations are possible through development of small industries.
Small industries are invigorating the
sweeping wave of information technology in the world and this is the best
opportunity for our country to avail of them. We can establish many industries
to harness that wave in our country. Sticking to the old idea that small
industries create jobs, has prevented real development of such industries in
our country. Unfortunately, both the government and Majlis believe that
development of small industries will lead to job creation. The world has given
up that idea which belongs to 1970s. High capacities in small industries have
encouraged such countries as Canada and Germany to invest a lot in their
development. They monitor developments in their small industries and
creditable stock exchanges of Tokyo, Toronto, and Montreal have defined a
special index for them. Therefore, small industries are sure to play an active
role in future economic activities of the world, especially in various stock
exchanges. We must come up with a solid strategy to develop small industries
and give up the idea of job creation through this sector.
Choosing Wrong
Paths:
Perhaps some analysts think that
the existing economic conditions of Iran are not suitable for development of
small industries due to lack of innovative capacities. This is quite true. For
this reason, the government should take primary steps to develop the sector.
When big industries face major problems they seek help from other entities,
but this is not available to small industries.
Small industries should feel that they
are being supported. The most important supports to be afforded by governments
are consultation, legal and financial services. Industrial nations establish
information systems to support their small industries and provide them with
needed services. Industrial hubs, technology parks, industrial clusters and
incubators are among those supports. Iran’s development passes through growth
of small industries. Therefore, the government shoulders heavy responsibility.
A reason why our country has not achieved industrial development after 40
years is ambiguity about strategic status of small industries. When the
governing populist theories introduce industry as a place for job creation,
the result of policies made for small industries will be radicalism. As a
result, no goal is achieved. Political radicalism of the government in
relation to industries has been adopted from viewpoints that were in vogue in
1970s and International Labor Organization was seeking a way to prove them.
That idea emphasized that people need work and welfare more than economic
growth. The theory which was known as "theory of basic needs" rapidly leads to
populist ideas. As the path to industrial development inclines toward people,
the industry follows suit.
A clear example in this regard is
provision of low interest loans to small industries. Basically, giving loans
to small industries, whatever of the underlying motives, will not be a
suitable measure. The most important problem which is facing small industries
is ideological radicalism. Therefore, granting loans to small industries will
lead to opposite results. They maintain that a large part of economic and
industrial problems could be solved through attention to demand. Such radical
or structuralist viewpoints ignore public aspects of economy and think that
reducing interest rate can solve many problems. Even when they believe in
correctness of that theory, they look at it from a populist angle, for
example, what will be the effect of reduced interest rate on people’s
livelihood?
The interest rate, which should regulate
economic relations, is reduced by the ninth government without attention to
its relationship with other economic issues. On the opposite foreign exchange
rate is constant to encourage importers import more goods. However, all those
variables, which bolster demand in the face of supply, are manipulated by the
government just to achieve populist goals. Interestingly, those manipulations
rapidly reveal the reverse effects. Even policies adopted for development of
small industries, do not bear fruit. If demand parallels supply in any
economic sector, that sector is sure to thrive.
Another point is that, granting such
loans will not led to development of small industries, but pave the way for
rent seeking. When manager of a small industrial unit only focuses on taking
loans without really believing in innovation, rent seeking will flourish.
Those managers only think about how to take a loan without having a clear plan
to use that loan.
Change in
Attitude:
Changing the government’s attitude
to small industries should be a foremost priority for policymakers. Investment
in small industries should be supported by the government. An assessment of
the market will show whether the government or the private sector will be more
effective in this regard. The government should support such industries on the
basis of people’s needs.
Information technology and network
economy have provided conditions under which small industries can work without
needing a permit. Since many small industries are currently active in the
country in an unofficial manner, the government should make a plan to organize
them. It seems that the government is not able to fulfill its duties with
regard to small industries. I have no doubt that under current economic
conditions in Iran; small industries can lead to a major leap in the field of
information technology and even do the same with other economic sectors. ERP
(Enterprise Resource Planning), consultation, assembly and hardware account
for the bulk of small industries’ exports with regard to information
technology. In fact the government should follow suit with the global wave
that is sweeping small industries.
The field of activity of small
industries should not be limited. The industry’s scope could be quite vast.
Therefore, if we talk about supporting a section, it does not mean that other
sections should be forgotten. However, if we looked at that industry from a
strategic viewpoint, it should be treated as a hub for innovation and design
of new commodities. When small industries are added to each other, big steps
can be taken. Creating industrial clusters is one of those steps which can be
successful in view of economic and industrial conditions in Iran. Industrial
clusters can generate great power among producers running small industries.
The historical experience of our country shows that when clusters were created
according to expediencies, they have been successful. A major example is
traditional market (bazaar). Traditional industrial clusters have been
relatively disorganized due to introduction of modern industries. Every time
that government has been less involved in, economic success has been higher.
That is, government’s involvement has disorganized economic activities of the
private sector. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CURRENT ISSUE |
|
|
 |
|
| |
July 2007
No. 44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|