The Iranian economy has been most
dependent on oil during the past two years than anytime before. This reality
is taken into account by most economic analysts when analyzing the economic
situation of the country. Taking into account Iran’s oil revenues during the
said period, it seems that economic growth rate has not kept up with
increasing oil revenues. At the same time, the Fourth Economic Development
Plan has projected strategies for Iran’s economic growth and analysts maintain
that if those strategies were taken into consideration, Iran’s economic
situation would not have been as critical as it is right now.
It seems that this is part of the
economic realities of Iran and that noncompliance with economic policies or
lack of economic stability has emerged as a major problem. The Fourth Economic
Development Plan can be a good example in this regard. The plan had been
formulated by economic experts of Iran before being sent to the archives by
the ninth government. According to Dr. Hamid Reza Baradaran Shoraka, the
former head of Management and Planning Organization, in view of Iran’s oil
revenues during the past two years, the Iranian economy should have
experienced a 10-percent growth rate, but the most optimistic estimates give a
figure of 5.5 percent. The comparison shows that Iran’s economy lags behind
the projected goals by 4.5 percent. During a meeting at Baran Foundation, Dr.
Bayazid Mardoukhi noted that during the past royal dynasties Iran lacked a
concrete economic plan, but in contemporary times, intellectuals managed to
convince the rulers that there are better ways to run the country. "This
marked the beginning of the Constitutional Revolution. However, despite the
arrival of ideas into our country, we were deprived of needed mechanisms," he
added.
The expert stated that some
intellectuals reached the conclusion in 1930s that something should be done
and proposed that a roadmap should be formulated for the country, which led to
introduction of the first 7-year development plan of the country in 1948.
Mardoukhi further noted that the first
plan included a number of projects, which were implemented partially and
brought relative stability to the country and the second plan followed the
same lines. He said that after nationalization of the oil industry and the
military coup of August 19, 1953, new directions were set. "The third
development plan revolved around infrastructural and production plans which
were relatively supplemented by the fourth and fifth plans," he said.
The expert noted that the sixth plan was
drawn up by the then Plan and Budget Organization which sought to achieve
ambitious goals. It followed the model experienced in South Korea, but due to
problems and orders from the former Shah, it was not implemented before the
Islamic Revolution.
"In 1982, the Plan and Budget
Organization decided to draw up a plan for the years 1983 through 1987 and
this paved the way for the implementation of the First Economic Development
Plan. After the end of the Iraqi imposed war, planners aimed at rebuilding
economic infrastructures and a number of projects were implemented during the
Reconstruction Period without taking serious steps as to production. The
Second Economic Development Plan pursued insignificant goals, but the Third
Economic Development Plan targeted structural reforms. Planners reached the
conclusion that as long as infrastructures have not been corrected, no plan
could be successful. There were many innovations in those plans, but
unemployment and inflationary pressures were not controlled," he said.
The expert noted that during that
period, economic structures were relatively corrected. Thus, the Third
Economic Development Plan was the most comprehensive plan that has been drawn
up thus far.
"Development plans were bureaucratic
plans and the role played by the people was insignificant. A question facing
planners is how people can do their part for the formulation of such plans?
The then president also emphasized that plans should be drawn up in such a way
that they would pay attention to the people’s needs," he said.
Mardoukhi further stated that the least
amount of delay in implementing development plans would lead to great lag in
economic growth. "No plan can correct the social culture, but can provide the
government with good means to do this. Economic development is defined as
increasing material and spiritual capacities of the society to achieve goals.
Therefore, creating jobs and increasing revenues can only be done through
economic planning," he concluded.
Further in the meeting, Dr. Baradaran
Shoraka noted that about 90 percent of the Iranian economy is dependent on oil
and oil reserves are constitutionally at the possession of the government.
"Oil is an inter-generational asset and we must think about future generations
too," he added.
Shoraka emphasized that the Iranian
society’s lack of suitable plans and vague information on people’s demands are
the main reasons which abort planning in Iran. "Under these conditions, the
country needs urgent planning and dissolution of the Management and Planning
Organization should ring the alarms for the Iranian planners…. In Western
countries, economic corporations formulate development plans outside the
government. As long as such institutions have not come into being in Iran, we
would need other institutions such as the Management and Planning
Organization," he said.
Former head of the Management and
Planning Organization (which was reduced to planning department of
Presidential Office under the ninth government) further stated that
sustainable development through a global approach was the main goal of the
Fourth Economic Development Plan which aimed to help Iran rank the first in
the region. "However, there are not fixed strategies in Iran and they change
as the governments change," he said.
Baradaran Shoraka further stated that
studies were conducted before the formulation of the Fourth Economic
Development Plan which showed that the Iranian economy enjoyed a traditional
and trade-based structure, which should be changed to a production-based,
modern structure.
"The society, unfortunately, was looking
forward to be offered a readymade prescription…. Every plan needs to pay
attention to structures…. The Fourth Economic Development Plan had projected
that political parties should be established to end government’s exclusive
control on political matters. It also aimed to turn Iran into a modern and
developed country by promoting nongovernmental organizations and encouraging
their participation in social and cultural affairs," he said.
Baradaran Shoraka stated that at a time
that oil sold at an average of 60 dollars per barrel, the government closed
the Management and Planning Organization. "The Fourth Economic Development
Plan was based on a foreign exchange revenue of 175 billion dollars in five
years, but the government has earned more than 130 billion dollars in the
first two years of the plan. Therefore, economic growth rate should have
reached 10 percent, while the actual figure is 5.5 percent. This is due to
misallocation of resources," he concluded.