 |
|
Dr. Alireza Baradaran Shoraka, Economist |
Head of the former Management and
Planning Organization under the reformist government criticized dissolution of
the organization by the ninth government and its reduction to a department
under the president’s supervision. Referring to outcomes of the dissolution,
he emphasized that absence of the Management and Planning Organization will
have untoward consequences for the country. Alireza Baradaran Shoraka added,
“Unfortunately, due to basic changes made to the organization, it has suffered
a lot and has failed to fulfill its main duties. For example, the Fourth
Economic Development Plan Act had projected that the Management and Planning
Organization should prepare reports and documents for submission to the
parliament on the performance of different government departments and
organizations. After dissolution of the Management and Planning Organization,
these tasks have been forgotten and occasional reports are presented to the
parliament after a long delay.
Shoraka explained about problems
resulting from absence of the Management and Planning Organization, saying,
“This organization was, in fact, a secretariat for several high councils in
our country.”
“We prepared reports and presented them
to High Economic Council for specialized discussions. The Management and
Planning Organization was one of the best specialized organizations in the
world in terms of specialists it employed. Therefore, we were able to prepare
reports on all issues which were discussed at those councils. The Management
and Planning Organization drew up all kinds of reports and presented them to
councilors to be discussed for decision-making. The High Administrative
Council adopted important decisions on administrative and employment issues.
After the Management and Planning Organization was dissolved, those councils
were also dissolved and their duties were delegated to Majlis commissions. Of
course, the Expediency Council is currently discussing this issue and MPs
believe that those councils, which had been established according to the law,
should be revived.”
Shoraka said, “The Secretariat of Board
of Trustees of the Oil Stabilization Fund was established at the Management
and Planning Organization and it drew up various reports to protect the
reserves of the Oil Stabilization Fund. Funds drawn from the Oil Stabilization
Fund by the ninth government exceeds those of the reformist government by a
wide margin.”
Former head of the Management and
Planning Organization also told Baran that oil reserves and the Oil
Stabilization Fund are very valuable and should be taken advantage of in a
good manner.
“Oil reserves should be used correctly,
so that, they would be kept for future generations and should be used for
productive investments. Unfortunately, since the Board of Trustees has been
dismissed and its duties have been transferred to the government’s Economic
Commission, a total of 5 billion dollars have been withdrawn from the fund
thus far and it is said another 30 billion dollars will be drawn in order to
cover next year’s budget deficit. They also say that 5 billion dollars will be
withdrawn from OSF to be appropriated to industries and repayment of
government loans to the banks in order to increase banks’ capital to 15
billion dollars. Unfortunately no attention is paid to the consequences of
such decisions for the domestic economy both at present, and in future.”
Shoraka stated that the budget deficit
is about 300,000 billion rials while the total budget is 450,000 billion rials.
“Therefore, the deficit amounts to 60-70 percent of the total budget. If the
Management and Planning Organization were there to formulate a rational budget
bill, they would not have to declare such a big budget deficit in August.
Absence of the Management and Planning Organization has had its negative
impacts on different economic structures of the country.”
Shoraka added, “If they give statistics
that Iran’s economic growth, excluding oil, is 7.7 percent; then the growth
rate under the former governments should be also given after excluding oil. In
2003, the economic growth rate, excluding oil, stood at 7.9 percent. However,
considering oil, it should be noted that Iran’s economic growth rate stood at
6 percent during the Third Economic Development Plan and currently stands at
about 6.5 percent. When we achieved a growth rate of 6 percent during the
Third Economic Development Plan, oil was sold for 15-16 dollars per barrel.
During the past three years, every barrel of oil has sold at an average price
of 85 dollars. Since I believe that 90 percent of our economy is dependent on
oil, the growth rate during the past three years should have been much higher
than 6.5 percent and should have hit 8.5-9 percent.
Therefore, the government should be held
responsible for failing to use high revenues to fuel economic growth. At the
same time, an average economic growth rate of 8 percent was an obligation
according to the Fourth Economic Development Plan stipulations. The Management
and Planning Organization played a very important role in long-term
decision-making by officials and this was not limited to the government,
because it actually helped all the three powers. After the Management and
Planning Organization was dissolved efficiency of planning and budgeting
systems has decreased and, at present, many Majlis deputies maintain that the
budget deficit would hit 30 billion dollars during the current year.”
Shoraka further noted that an 8-percent
economic growth rate was an objective of the Fourth Economic Development Plan.
“Therefore, the economic growth rate achieved by the ninth government is both
below the projected figure of the Fourth Economic Development Plan and not
compatible with our growth potentials. This proves that the existing
government has failed in efficient management of valuable oil revenues,” he
concluded.