|
|
| |
|
|
|
January
2009, Nos. 50&51 |
|
|
|
Cover Story |
|
 |
|
Global Economy Crisis and
End of Oil Party |
|
The past three years could have been
the most legendary period of the Iranian economy because we earned 200
billion dollars by selling oil and gas. |
Capital crisis, lowering oil prices and
its impact on the Iranian economy have been discussed in the following
interview with Mohsen Safaei Farahani, former member of sixth Majlis' Plan and
Budget Commission.
What is your viewpoint about the sudden rise and subsequent
fall of oil prices and its impact on the Iranian economy?
 |
|
M. Safaei Farahani |
International oil prices started to rise
in 2004 mostly due to booming economic activities in India and China as well
as speculations related to future oil sales at international markets. It was
clear that although this growth was in favor of the oil producing countries,
but it was not a logical economic growth. Therefore, all people who were
involved in formulating the Fourth Economic Development Plan in Iran were not
optimistic because although the oil price is usually rooted in supply and
demand, it has other economic causes too. Economic growth in the world showed
that oil prices were false and due to current conditions in international
capital markets, they have started to fall.
We should have known that oil prices
will start to fall sooner or later, but this occurred in the worst time when
we are facing a global economic crisis; that is, in addition to the oil
market, the economic crisis has also affected the oil price. The crisis
started about four months ago (though its signs loomed about three years ago)
as a result of selling mortgage bonds by banks. As international economic
figures show, the price fall in those bonds is about 7,000 to 11,000 billion
dollars which is tantamount to the annual gross domestic product of the United
States and about 25 percent of the world’s gross domestic product.
This crisis is engulfing industrial
countries. This means that after reduction in the oil price, this will happen
to metals and many automakers will reduce production because of the
threatening economic outlook.
In Iran, however, Table 8 of the Fourth
Economic Development Plan which is about next year had considered Iran’s oil
revenues at 82 billion dollars; that is, 23-24 dollars per barrel. We were
hopeful to bring about an economic growth rate of 8 percent and boost
investment by 12 percent in order to assure sustainable development while
depositing needed foreign exchange reserves at the Oil Stabilization Fund.
The ninth government, however, showed no
respect for the Budget Act. It first fixed the foreign exchange rate. Although
the Fourth Economic Development Plan had aimed at gradual reduction of
subsidies and introduction of real prices, the ninth government fixed prices
and caused high energy consumption in the country, so that, we exported 2.75
million barrels per day of oil in 2004, but we have reduced it to 2.35 million
barrels per day due to increased domestic demand. Reduced exports and
increased domestic oil price is a major concern and it is the policymakers and
planners that have encouraged the society to consume more energy.
|
Under the existing circumstances and
due to excessive consumption, the government is facing a budget deficit of
15 billion dollars. |
 |
Although the Fourth Economic Development
Plan had precisely predicted the annual budget and current expenses were to
rise in a balanced manner, both the government and the Majlis approved the
budget supplements and expanded the current budget to over 80 percent of the
projected figure. For example, the current budget for 2006 had been predicted
at 420,000 billion rials by the existing Budget Act while the Fourth Economic
Development Plan had predicted it at 240,000 billion rials and what was
approved by the Majlis showed a deviation of about 90 percent from the
projected figure. We have gotten the society and the government used to high
expenses and instead of depositing oil revenues at the Oil Stabilization Fund,
we spent it on current expenses. The Fourth Economic Development Plan had
projected the oil price at 20-25 dollars per barrel, but the actual price was
80-100 dollars per barrel. Now, seven months have passed since the beginning
of the current Iranian year and we may not face major problems due to oil
reserves. However, a country which has to import about 8 million tons of wheat
and 3 million tons of sugar, rice, and vegetable oil and even fodder for
livestock, and whose imports have increased from about 26 million dollars to
50 billion dollars should sell oil for 80 dollars per barrel to make up for
that 50-billion-dollar difference.
Although economic experts had warned that the domestic
economy has become more dependent on oil more than before, we are dependent on
an oil which is sold for 80 dollars per barrel. What will happen to the
country under these circumstances?
Under the existing circumstances and due
to excessive consumption, the government is facing a budget deficit of 15
billion dollars. However, since the country has been made dependent on oil
prices higher than 60 dollars per barrel and in view of price fluctuations in
international markets, our country is in for major problems and next year will
be a difficult year for us. We have been used to high spending in the past
three years and we have greatly increased imports in order to control
inflation. Now that oil prices are falling, we will have to brace for lower
revenues, but our society is not ready for this shock. Both current spending
by state-run bodies has increased, and the market is awash with consumer goods
that have been imported through high oil prices. Domestic plants are facing
major production problems. Our banks are giving facilities to importers
because the government has enforced low interest rate and that money is spent
on imports instead of being used for production. Production cycle is one year,
but import cycle is less than six months. On the other hand, the high number
of importers has motivated banks to allocate more resources to them in order
to gain more profit.
As a result, the country has been facing
a major problem during the past three years and producers are short of needed
money. Our foreign policy, on the other hand, has reduced our country’s
international credibility to zero and this has affected both state-run and
private sectors. Before the ninth government, we had about 35 billion dollars
of credits in European and world banks which had been guaranteed by the
government and credits pertaining to our businesspeople alone, stood at 15
billion dollars. Now, in the second half of the Iranian year 1387 (March 2008
– March 2009) the 50-billion-dollar credit has been reduced to zero.
Therefore, producers and investors are also under external pressures due to
shortage of credits and despite slogans chanted by the ninth government,
consumption, imports, and dependence on oil has greatly increased.
We have never been this much dependent
on oil. The past three years could have been the most legendary period of the
Iranian economy because we earned 200 billion dollars by selling oil and gas.
Since the annual budget had been projected at 50 billion dollars the
difference between 50 and 200 billion dollars shows that we have earned four
times the expected budgetary figure. Our foreign exchange revenues in the past
three years was higher than all we got under eight year of the reformist
government and about one-third of Iran’s foreign exchange revenues over the
past 30 years.
That legendary situation could have
ushered the Iranian economy into a new phase of unprecedented prosperity, but
populist measures and lack of clear policies have caused most of that money to
be squandered. Now our budget has been based on oil sales for 100 dollars per
barrel, but the politicians who have run the country in this way are not aware
that the oil party is over and prices have begun to fall. The oil price hike
was a special feast. Those who review world economy are aware that no basic
change has been made in global economy to justify increase in oil prices from
40 dollars per barrel to 140 dollars per barrel in a short period of time.
Of course, understanding this situation
required economic rationality, which was lacking in the country. We will have
to pay more for imports and this will rise domestic prices and foster an
underground economy. Therefore, the government will be facing a more terrific
budget deficit in the coming years. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CURRENT ISSUE |
|
|
 |
|
| |
January 2009
Nos. 50&51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|