|
2010 |
 |
|
We
predict growth in advanced economies to become positive in 2010 |
The global economy is facing its worst crisis in 60 years. In the first half
of the 2000s, a benign environment led investors, firms, and consumers to
expect a permanently bright future and to underestimate risk. Housing and
other asset prices shot up, risky assets were created and sold as being nearly
riskless, and leverage increased. So when housing prices turned around, and
subprime mortgages and the securities based on them turned sour, the stage was
set for the crisis. In the context of rapid global integration and deep and
complex interconnections between financial institutions, the crisis quickly
moved across assets, markets, and economies. The rest is history, or, more
precisely, history in the making.
Looking at where we are today, the good news, if any, is that we have probably
stepped back from the brink of financial catastrophe. In October, faced with
what looked like an imminent implosion of the financial system, major advanced
economies announced a coherent set of measures to deal with the problem. In
addition to continuing the provision of liquidity, governments initiated
programs to buy bad assets, recapitalize financial institutions, and provide
comprehensive guarantees. To be sure, these are extremely complex measures to
implement, and implementation has been far from perfect, with governments
feeling their way through the right combination of measures as they go along.
The message from the financial markets at this point is that progress has been
made, but it is much too early to declare victory. Indeed, while the financial
crisis has moderated somewhat in advanced economies, it has increasingly
engulfed emerging economies. Through no fault of their own, many countries are
facing sudden stops, pressure on the exchange rate, and the danger of
financial disruptions.
Looking at where we are today, the good news, if any, is that we have
probably stepped back from the brink of financial catastrophe.
|
The bad news, however, is that, as policymakers in advanced economies were
adopting appropriate measures on the financial front, the financial crisis
began to have a sharper and deeper impact on the real economy. Deleveraging by
financial institutions has now translated into more expensive credit for
households and firms, and difficulties in financing even normal business
operations. And, more importantly (at least in terms of its quantitative
effects), consumers and firms across the globe have lost confidence. Fears of
a long and deep recession, similar to the experience of the 1930s, have
triggered worries about job security, savings, and credit. As a result,
consumer spending has slumped, business investment has shrunk, and
unemployment is rising rapidly.
These developments, notably the collapse of confidence over the past two
months, led the IMF to revise its forecast substantially down from the October
World Economic Outlook. We are now projecting output to decline in advanced
economies by 1/4 percent on an annual basis in 2009, marking the first annual
contraction in the post-war period for this group of countries. Based on the
expectation that house prices will turn around sometime in 2009 and
deleveraging will slow going forward, we predict growth in advanced economies
to become positive in 2010. We also expect growth in emerging and low-income
economies to moderate, because of weakening global growth prospects, plunging
commodity prices, and tight financial conditions. Any hope of decoupling is
now long gone.
How confident are we about these forecasts? Not very. On the upside, it could
be that the decline in spending is not due to pessimism per se, but is a
result of uncertainty—consumers and firms may be delaying spending until there
is greater clarity concerning economic prospects. A decrease in uncertainty
may then lead to greater consumption and investment demand, allowing output to
recover faster than projected. On the downside, there is a clear risk that the
fall in output could worsen the balance sheets of financial institutions more
than expected, leading to a further contraction in credit, causing further
bankruptcies and further worsening economic activity.
This is the environment in which the G-20 meeting took place in Washington in
November. The agenda for policymakers in general, and for the IMF in
particular, is simple: first, extinguish the current fires—identify and adopt
policies that will limit economic damage in advanced, emerging, and low-income
countries. Second, be proactive in thinking about how best to avoid a repeat
of what we are now going through. Let me take both parts in turn.
Policies for now:
What needs to be done in the short run is clear, if not easy. Governments must
attack the crisis on two fronts. They must implement and refine the policies
adopted in the past few months to deal with the financial crisis. And they
must take strong measures to sustain demand, limit the fall in output, and
restore confidence and private spending.
On the first front, I argued earlier that the policy framework—organized
around liquidity provision, asset purchases, recapitalization, and
guarantees—was largely in place. The implementation, which is inherently
complex, is however proving difficult. Changes in policy and ambiguities about
future policy are in some cases making things worse rather than better. Until
the programs are clarified, and rules of the game more clearly established,
private investors are unlikely to be enthused, worsening the crisis and
delaying the adjustment in the financial system.
On the second front, it is clear that the onus will have to be on fiscal
policy. While some countries, notably in Europe, still have some room to ease
monetary policy further, others—especially the United States and Japan—have
already decreased interest rates to very low levels, and real rates are rising
as inflation falls.
Fiscal expansion must, therefore, now play the central role. What should be
the size of the expansion and which countries should provide the stimulus? We
have come to the conclusion that, at this point, the goal should be a fiscal
boost of about 2 percent of global GDP. Assuming a multiplier of one—a
conservative assumption if the fiscal stimulus is well targeted—this would
translate into 2 percent higher global growth, reducing substantially the risk
of a deep recession. To avoid spillover effects, however, it is essential that
fiscal expansion is, if not explicitly coordinated, undertaken by all
countries where low debt and disciplined policies in the past have provided
sufficient policy space. A caveat is important here: if the decrease in output
turned out to be even worse than we currently forecast, the fiscal expansion
would have to be even larger than we currently recommend. The reason: what is
essential at this juncture is to eliminate the risk of a full-fledged
depression, and its adverse effects on spending today.
Preparing for the after-crisis:
Let's now turn to the future. When the crisis abates (if we can imagine such a
time), governments will have to tackle two main issues.
First, they will face a dramatically different fiscal position. The fiscal
deficits needed to increase demand in the short run will result in higher debt
in the long run, often by significant amounts. In most countries, the scale of
public interventions in troubled institutions and the purchase of assets will
lead to much higher gross debt. However, as the value of the assets they will
have acquired may be substantial, the increase in net debt is likely to be
much smaller. Still, the fiscal position of the government will be
significantly leveraged, and will require the adoption of a more flexible
fiscal policy stance.
Second, in several countries, the financial landscape will look dramatically
different, comprising a significantly consolidated financial sector, with a
large public presence. Governments will face a number of questions about how
to manage their presence in the financial sector. The goal here should be to
maintain a level playing field with privately owned institutions, and to
steadily allow the return of the financial sector to private hands. Experience
from many past banking crises provides a useful guide on how best to do this. |