The Iranian minister of economic affairs
and finance declared his ministry’s readiness to issue international bonds in
order to attract foreign investments.
Seyed Shamseddin Hosseini, who was
addressing a conference entitled “international conference To introduce
investment opportunities of Khuzestan” in Ahvaz, noted that THE Ministry of
Economic Affairs and Finance was ready to hand out international bonds,
saying, “Given good investment grounds in Iran and suitable investment return,
we should be able to attract 20 billion dollars in foreign investment per year
and this is by no means ambitious.”
Hosseini added that due to international
economic crisis last year, total foreign investment in the world went down by
more than 30 percent, but Iran experienced 60 percent growth in foreign
investment which indicates the country’s abilities and comparative investment
advantages.
Hosseini stated that those who are
interested in investing in Iran will not heed the remarks of a few hostile and
arrogant states because they are not willing to lose the benefits of
investment in Iran.
Chairman of Iran Chamber of Commerce,
Industries and Mines also addressed the conference saying that experts should
find THE root causes of problems and should see why attraction of foreign
investment in Turkey has been 20 times higher than Iran though Turkey lacks a
province like Khuzestan with all its oil and gas reserves.
Mohammad Nahavandiyan then criticized
the existing situation of foreign investment in the country and noted,
“Although Iran ranks 51 among 141 countries in terms of investment potentials,
in terms of performance, it ranks 133 and this shows that the way is not paved
for the Iranian economy to claim its deserved share of the global economy.”
Nahavandiyan stated that few places in
the world enjoy the same strategic advantages as Iran and Khuzestan province
for that matter, asking, “Why we have not been able to realize our goal for
access to free waters in the Persian Gulf?”
“When it comes to entrepreneurship, the
first change which should be made is to give more latitude to the private
sector and the sector should not just play a perfunctory role. If we are going
to talk to the world in economic terms, we should know that the world wants to
deal with our private sector,” he said.
The official added that there should be
no discrimination between a private entity and a state-run one in the business
sphere of the country.
Pointing to the goal of reaching an
8-percent growth in gross national product, chairman of Iran Chamber of
Commerce, Industries and Mines stated that to achieve a growth rate of 8
percent in gross national product, “we would need 380 billion dollars
according to standard method and 110 billion dollars per year according to PPP
method. Figures on infrastructural investment are much bigger. Domestic and
foreign investment need a radical change in our economic approach because the
Iranian economy is plagued with a centralized approach.”
Nahavandiyan emphasized that Khuzestan
is among those provinces which has suffered the most from government’s control
over the economy in the past 80 years, adding, “Most investments in Khuzestan
have been made by the government and the private sector has not had an active
role in this respect.”
Pointing to nationalization of oil
industry in Iran, he added that nationalization meant that people should
control the oil industry, not foreigners. “However, it did not mean that the
oil industry should be run by the government,” he added.
The official noted that oil industry
experts have done a laudable work in Iran, but if this had been done in
competition with the private sector, now Iran’s status in world economy and
energy economy would have been much higher.
Chairman of Iran Chamber of Commerce,
Industries and Mines noted that structural changes in economy by transferring
control from government to the private sector should be the main step to be
taken in Khuzestan just in the same way that it should happen to the whole of
the Iranian economy.
He added that transferring ownership of
state-run companies to entities which are still controlled by the government
cannot help realization of the general goals of Article 44 of the constitution
and cannot increase efficiency and productivity.
He said that according to Paragraph 91
of Article 44 of the constitution, the private sector should be present in
economic decision-making centers.
“At provincial level, there should be no
decision-making session unless the voice of economic activists is heard there.
If the government and state officials consulted economic activists, they would
have certainly achieved better results,” he added.